【24h】

Comparison of induction motor field efficiency evaluation methods

机译:感应电动机磁场效率评估方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

Unlike testing motor efficiency in a laboratory, certain methods given in the IEEE-Std 112 cannot be used for motor efficiency evaluations in the field. For example, it is difficult to load a motor in the field with a dynamometer when the motor is already coupled to driven equipment. The motor efficiency field evaluation faces a different environment from that for which the IEEE-Std 112 is chiefly written. A field evaluation method consists of one or several basic methods. This paper separates and compares the basic methods according to their physical natures. Their intrusivenesses and accuracies are also discussed. This study is useful for field engineers to select or to establish a proper efficiency evaluation method by understanding the theories and error sources of the methods.
机译:与在实验室中测试电动机效率不同,IEEE-Std 112中给出的某些方法不能用于现场电动机效率评估。例如,当电动机已经耦合到从动设备上时,很难用测力计在野外给电动机加载。电机效率领域评估面临的环境与主要编写IEEE-Std 112的环境不同。现场评估方法由一种或几种基本方法组成。本文根据其物理性质对基本方法进行了分离和比较。还讨论了它们的侵入性和准确性。这项研究对于现场工程师通过了解方法的理论和误差来源来选择或建立适当的效率评估方法非常有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号