首页> 外文会议>Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 1995. IGARSS '95. 'Quantitative Remote Sensing for Science and Applications', International >Comparison of cloud liquid water retrieved from an airborne millimetre wave radiometer with SSM/I and in situ cloud measurements
【24h】

Comparison of cloud liquid water retrieved from an airborne millimetre wave radiometer with SSM/I and in situ cloud measurements

机译:使用SSM / I和原位云测量结果比较从机载毫米波辐射计获​​得的云液态水

获取原文

摘要

The validation of retrievals of the liquid water path (LWP) from microwave radiometers (e.g. SMMR, SSM/I) has proven difficult due to the scarcity of adequate ground truth. However validation is essential to allow proper use of this data in numerical weather prediction and climate studies. In the paper the authors compare three independent measures of LWP. The SSM/I has been widely used to retrieve LWP using statistical algorithms and in the paper the authors also use an iterative physical approach. Finer resolution LWP retrievals can be made by flying an airborne microwave radiometer just above cloud top but coincident with the SSM/I overpass. Data from the Microwave Airborne Radiometer Scanning System (MARSS) on the UK meteorological Office C-130 aircraft has been used and the retrieval of LWP is from an iterative physical scheme. This aircraft is also equipped with a hot wire Johnson-Williams probe for direct in situ measurements of cloud liquid content. The cloud liquid water content can also be estimated by integrating the dropsize distributions measured by the PMS FSSP and 2DC dropsize counters. By profiling through the cloud the LWP can be calculated. Despite the difference of scales of the different measurements which make direct comparison difficult excellent relative and reasonable absolute agreement has been achieved, especially using a physical iterative approach. Pollution tracks from ships can significantly modify the microphysics of stratocumulus. The sensitivity of MARSS LWP retrievals to changes in the microphysics has been tested using observations from the MAST experiment.
机译:由于缺乏足够的地面真相,已证明很难验证从微波辐射计(例如SMMR,SSM / I)获取的液态水路径(LWP)。但是,验证对于在数值天气预报和气候研究中正确使用此数据至关重要。在本文中,作者比较了LWP的三种独立测量方法。 SSM / I已被广泛用于使用统计算法检索LWP,并且在本文中,作者还使用了迭代物理方法。可以通过在云层正上方飞行一个机载微波辐射计来进行更高分辨率的LWP检索,但与SSM / I立交桥重合。英国气象局C-130飞机上的微波机载辐射计扫描系统(MARSS)的数据已被使用,并且LWP的检索来自迭代的物理方案。这架飞机还配备了约翰逊-威廉姆斯(Johnson-Williams)热线探头,可直接就地测量云层液体含量。还可通过对由PMS FSSP和2DC液滴尺寸计数器测量的液滴尺寸分布进行积分来估算云中的液态水含量。通过云分析,可以计算出LWP。尽管不同测量的尺度不同,这使直接比较变得困难,但仍实现了极好的相对和合理的绝对一致性,尤其是使用物理迭代方法时。船舶的污染轨迹会极大地改变平流层的微观物理特性。使用来自MAST实验的观察结果测试了MARSS LWP检索对微物理学变化的敏感性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号