首页> 外文会议>Personal Wireless Communications, 1994., IEEE International Conference on >Cost comparison of wireline and wireless access for the public switched telephone network (PSTN)
【24h】

Cost comparison of wireline and wireless access for the public switched telephone network (PSTN)

机译:公用电话交换网(PSTN)的有线和无线访问成本比较

获取原文

摘要

The access network has been considered to be the most costly part of the public switched telephone network. Traditionally, the subscriber lines have been based on copper wireline. Today, however, wireless technologies, e.g. cellular radio, can be used for this purpose as well. A cost comparison is made between the wireline and wireless access in order to find out the most feasible way to build new fixed subscriber lines. The comparison is based on a cost modelling study made by Nokia and Telecom Finland for the World Bank. The network alternatives were modeled on a study area which consisted of eight subareas each-having different characteristics. The investment costs covered the following equipment costs: exchange and the associated remote site equipment (concentrators, multiplexers and radio base stations), transmission equipment, infrastructure for equipment sites (including buildings, radio masts and antennas), and in-house cabling.
机译:接入网被认为是公共交换电话网中最昂贵的部分。传统上,用户线基于铜线。但是,今天,无线技术例如蜂窝无线电也可以用于此目的。为了找出建立新的固定用户线的最可行方法,在有线和无线访问之间进行了成本比较。比较是基于诺基亚和芬兰电信针对世界银行进行的成本建模研究。网络替代方案是在一个研究区域中建模的,该研究区域由八个子区域组成,每个子区域具有不同的特征。投资成本包括以下设备成本:交换机和相关的远程站点设备(集中器,多路复用器和无线电基站),传输设备,设备站点的基础结构(包括建筑物,无线电天线杆和天线)以及内部布线。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号