首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Energy Conference >Comparison of wind turbine power control strategies to provide power reserves
【24h】

Comparison of wind turbine power control strategies to provide power reserves

机译:风力涡轮机电源控制策略提供电源储备的比较

获取原文

摘要

Due to an increasing amount of wind turbines in the power system, which have a volatile power output, the need for flexibility increases. This flexibility can be obtained by ancillary services. Therefore, the provision of ancillary services with wind turbines is gaining interest. As they currently do not participate in the frequency control, this might compromise the proper functioning of the power system. The modern turbines are equipped with a power-electronic converter, so they can be used to provide a variety of ancillary services when the appropriate control strategies are used. In this paper, the provision of active power reserves for frequency control is considered. Three state-of-the-art power control strategies, i.e., constant power control, linear slope control and percentage control are compared to determine their ability to maintain reserves. It is concluded that all the strategies are able to provide reserves, but linear slope control and percentage control perform the best, especially when the wind turbines are aggregated in wind farms.
机译:由于电力系统中的风力涡轮机的增加,具有易失性功率输出,需要灵活性增加。这种灵活性可以通过辅助服务获得。因此,提供带风力涡轮机的辅助服务正在获得兴趣。由于它们目前不参与频率控制,这可能会损害电力系统的正常运行。现代涡轮机配有电力电子转换器,因此当使用适当的控制策略时,它们可用于提供各种辅助服务。本文认为,考虑提供用于频率控制的有功功率储备。比较了三种最先进的电力控制策略,即恒定功率控制,线性斜坡控制和百分比控制,以确定它们保持储备的能力。结论是,所有策略都能够提供储备,但线性斜率控制和百分比控制执行最佳,特别是当风力涡轮机在风电场聚集时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号