首页> 外文会议>International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management >ASSESSING SCORING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AWARD WINNERS AND NON-AWARD WINNERS FOR THE MALCOLM BALRIGE NATIONAL QUALITY AWARD
【24h】

ASSESSING SCORING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AWARD WINNERS AND NON-AWARD WINNERS FOR THE MALCOLM BALRIGE NATIONAL QUALITY AWARD

机译:评估奖获奖者与非奖获得者对MALCOLM BALRIGE国家质量奖之间的评分差异

获取原文

摘要

The Malcolm Baldrige Performance Excellence Model has proven to be a valuable tool for use by organizations interested in performance excellence. A form of it is used by almost all industrialized countries including Japan to improve on performance excellence in various sectors of the economy. The purpose of this research is to use the scoring data from a state program to investigate which categories show significant differences in scoring between those who win the award and those that do not. Fisher's Discriminant analysis is used to show that there is significant difference at a 0.05 significance level, between scores for all 7 criteria for award w inners and those who do not win the award. The classification function resulted in a strong correlation coefficient of 0.82, with 87.5% and 100% true positive and true negative respectively. The result shows that scores for all 7 criteria play a significant role in winning an award.
机译:Malcolm Baldrige性能卓越型号已被证明是对对卓越性能感兴趣的组织使用的有价值的工具。几乎所有工业化国家都使用了一种形式,包括日本,以改善经济各个部门的卓越卓越。本研究的目的是使用国家计划中评分数据来调查哪些类别显示出赢得奖励的人之间的得分显着差异。 Fisher的判别分析用于表明,在奖励的所有7个标准和不赢得奖励的人之间的分数之间存在显着差异。分类函数导致强的相关系数为0.82,分别为87.5%和100%阳性和真实阴性。结果表明,所有7个标准的分数在赢得奖励方面发挥着重要作用。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号