首页> 外文会议>International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management >ASSESSMENT OF DESIGN-BUILD VS. DESIGN-BID-BUILD CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY METHODS
【24h】

ASSESSMENT OF DESIGN-BUILD VS. DESIGN-BID-BUILD CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY METHODS

机译:评估设计构建与设计出价建设施工交付方法

获取原文

摘要

The construction delivery process has been led by the traditional Design-Bid-Build method for ages. While this process has shown great applicability in the construction industry, it can also deliver potential challenges to both owners and builders. The Design-Build delivery method has gained some attention as an alternative to the Design-Bid-Build delivery method as it seeks to improve its deficiencies. The impending issues of these construction processes will be addressed through a qualitative comparison of both the design-bid-build method and the design-build method. The ultimate goal is to determine whether design-build or design-bid-build is most appropriate for construction projects, while seeking to determine why one is used more often than the other. This study will assess topics regarding time to completion, project cost, claims, and more subjective matters such as the owner-contractor relationship and collaborative practices.
机译:施工交付过程已被传统的设计出价制造方法带领。虽然这一过程在建筑业的适用性方面表现出了很大的适用性,但它也可以为所有者和建筑商提供潜在的挑战。设计 - 构建交付方法对设计出价的交付方法的替代方案产生了一些关注,因为它旨在提高其缺陷。这些施工过程的即将发生的问题将通过设计 - 投标制造方法和设计 - 构建方法的定性比较来解决。最终目标是确定设计构建或设计出价是最适合建设项目的,同时寻求确定为什么可以比另一个更频繁地使用。本研究将评估关于完成时间,项目成本,索赔以及更多主观事项,例如所有者承包商关系和协作实践的主题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号