首页> 外文会议> >The Aircraft Noise Simulation Working Group (ANSWr) - Tool Benchmark and Reference Aircraft Results
【24h】

The Aircraft Noise Simulation Working Group (ANSWr) - Tool Benchmark and Reference Aircraft Results

机译:飞机噪声模拟工作组(ANSWr)-工具基准和参考飞机结果

获取原文

摘要

The Aircraft Noise Working Group (ANSWr) was established by DLR, ONERA, and NASA to compare simulation tools, establish guidelines for noise prediction, and to assess uncertainties associated with the simulation. To accomplish these goals, a benchmark problem was initiated by the group. The setup is documented and initial results for the reference aircraft are discussed. The reference aircraft is a conventional tube-and-wing configuration with the engines installed under the wings. The aircraft noise simulations are performed for departure and approach conditions, and the results obtained with three different system noise prediction tools are compared. At the aircraft level, the overall agreement is good among the three predictions. Peak noise levels agree within 3-4 dB. Fan and jet component predictions are generally very similar, although there can be differences of up to 7 dB in some fan tone levels. The prediction of airframe components shows the most disagreement among the three methods, with some differences of 6 dB for the major components and greater differences at high frequencies. There can also be differences in the frequency of the peak level and in the rank order of the airframe components. At the total airframe noise level, the differences are reduced to no more than 3-4 dB. While there is general agreement in shape characteristics of predicted ground noise isocontours, the differences among the three methods can result in more significant disagreement in the sizes of the isocontours.
机译:DLR,ONERA和NASA成立了飞机噪声工作组(ANSWr),以比较仿真工具,建立噪声预测准则并评估与仿真相关的不确定性。为了实现这些目标,该小组提出了一个基准问题。记录了设置情况,并讨论了参考飞机的初步结果。参考飞机是常规的管和机翼配置,发动机安装在机翼下方。针对起飞和进场条件执行飞机噪声仿真,并比较使用三种不同的系统噪声预测工具获得的结果。在飞机方面,三个预测之间的总体一致性良好。峰值噪声电平在3-4 dB之内。风扇和喷射组件的预测通常非常相似,尽管在某些风扇音调水平上可能会有高达7 dB的差异。机身成分的预测显示出三种方法之间的最大差异,主要成分之间的差异为6 dB,高频时的差异较大。峰值水平的频率和机身组件的等级顺序也可能存在差异。在整个机身噪声水平上,差异减小到不超过3-4 dB。尽管预测的地面噪声等值线的形状特征已达成普遍共识,但三种方法之间的差异可能导致等值线大小的更显着分歧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号