首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling >On the benefits of elastic spectrum management in multi-hour filterless metro networks
【24h】

On the benefits of elastic spectrum management in multi-hour filterless metro networks

机译:弹性频谱管理在数小时无过滤城域网中的优势

获取原文

摘要

The dawn of 5G is pushing operators to deploy high-capacity, agile networks capable of adapting to time-varying traffic patterns, especially into metro sections. ROADMs are key enablers for agility in the optical layer, however the benefits of this agility do not always compensate for increased costs. As such, filterless optical networks are emerging as a cost-effective and reliable solution compared to active photonics, thanks to a winning combination of coherent transponders and passive splitters/couplers. However, spectrum allocation management policies are of paramount importance to maximize the overall network throughput. In this paper, we focus on a filterless metro network where the hourly variation of the demands traffic is known, coming from historic data estimations. Then, we observe how the knowledge of the traffic profiles can be exploited. To assess this, we evaluate the performance, in terms of throughput, of three different spectrum management approaches: (i) fixed, where lightpaths remain static along time once allocated; (ii) semi-elastic, where lightpath-bandwidth vary according to current traffic requirements, but central frequency remains fixed; and (iii) hitless full-elastic, where any lightpath parameter may be reconfigured without disrupting the traffic. Besides, we consider two transponder types equipped with (i) shared or (ii) independent tunable lasers for transmission and reception, which affects to spectrum allocation of bidirectional connections. According to our results, the semi-elastic approach clearly outperforms the fixed approach (23-33% more throughput) with a reduced gap to the hitless full-elastic case (10-24% less throughput), especially considering that the latter is not commercially available yet. Interestingly, using dual-laser transponders only yields a 10% gain with respect to single-laser transponders for the semi-elastic scenario, and thus may not justify the extra hardware.
机译:5G的到来促使运营商部署大容量,敏捷的网络,这些网络能够适应时变的流量模式,尤其是在城域内。 ROADM是实现光学层敏捷性的关键推动力,但是这种敏捷性的优势并不能总弥补成本的增加。因此,得益于相干应答器和无源分离器/耦合器的成功结合,与有源光子技术相比,无滤波器光网络正在成为一种经济高效且可靠的解决方案。但是,频谱分配管理策略对于最大化整体网络吞吐量至关重要。在本文中,我们重点研究了无过滤器城域网,该网络可根据历史数据估算得知需求流量的每小时变化。然后,我们观察如何利用流量概况的知识。为了评估这一点,我们在吞吐量方面评估了三种不同频谱管理方法的性能:(i)固定的,其中光路在分配后随时间保持静态; (ii)半弹性的,其光路带宽根据当前的交通需求而变化,但中心频率保持固定; (iii)无冲击全弹性,其中可以重新配置任何光路参数而不会中断流量。此外,我们考虑两种发送器类型,它们配备(i)共享或(ii)独立的可调谐激光器进行发送和接收,这会影响双向连接的频谱分配。根据我们的结果,半弹性方法明显优于固定方法(吞吐量提高了23-33%),与无碰撞全弹性情况的差距减小了(吞吐量降低了10-24%),尤其是考虑到后者尚未在市场上出售。有趣的是,对于半弹性场景,使用单激光应答器仅比单激光应答器获得10%的增益,因此可能无法证明额外的硬件是合理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号