This paper adds data to help with the development of possible go-around criteria for transport category aircraft. Presently, airline procedures state that pilots make a go-around decision using multiple criteria at 1000 or 500 ft above the ground, or so-called gates. An experiment conducted on three level-D full-flight simulators investigated the conditions from which pilots cannot successfully recover from an unstable approach and make a normal landing. In addition, pilots' perceptions of risk under these various unstable approach conditions and resulting landings were assessed. Six crews, comprised of a captain and a first officer from the same airline, participated in each simulator. Both the captain and the first officer flew approaches and landings from 55 different initial conditions with varying gate heights, localizer deviations, glideslope deviations, reference-speed deviations, and rate of descents. The initial condition at the starting gate mainly affected longitudinal touchdown deviation and rate of descent at touchdown, with reference-speed deviation having the most significant effect Results show little difference in touchdown performance for conditions from the 300-ft and 500-ft gates. Conditions at the 100-ft gate introduced significant differences in touchdown performance. Reference-speed and localizer deviation at the starting gate had the strongest influences on perceived risk and go-around decision. In line with other studies, these findings suggest that a 300-ft go-around gate might be acceptable. More research is required to investigate the effects of environmental and runway variables before possible go-around criteria for transport category aircraft can be defined.
展开▼
