首页> 外文会议>International conference on artificial intelligence in education >Empirically Evaluating the Effectiveness of POMDP vs. MDP Towards the Pedagogical Strategies Induction
【24h】

Empirically Evaluating the Effectiveness of POMDP vs. MDP Towards the Pedagogical Strategies Induction

机译:基于经验的评估POMDP与MDP在教育策略归纳方面的有效性

获取原文

摘要

The effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs) often depends upon their pedagogical strategies, the policies used to decide what action to take next in the face of alternatives. We induce policies based on two general Reinforcement Learning (RL) frameworks: POMDP &. MDP, given the limited feature space. We conduct an empirical study where the RL-induced policies are compared against a random yet reasonable policy. Results show that when the contents are controlled to be equal, the MDP-based policy can improve students' learning significantly more than the random baseline while the POMDP-based policy cannot outperform the later. The possible reason is that the features selected for the MDP framework may not be the optimal feature space for POMDP.
机译:智能补习系统(ITS)的有效性通常取决于其教学策略,即用于决定面对替代方案时应采取何种措施的策略。我们基于两个通用的强化学习(RL)框架得出政策:POMDP&。鉴于功能空间有限,因此MDP。我们进行了一项实证研究,将RL诱导的政策与随机但合理的政策进行了比较。结果表明,当内容被控制为相等时,基于MDP的策略比随机基准可以显着提高学生的学习水平,而基于POMDP的策略则不能胜过后者。可能的原因是,为MDP框架选择的功能可能不是POMDP的最佳功能空间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号