首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Cyber Conflict >Pressing pause: A new approach for international cybersecurity norm development
【24h】

Pressing pause: A new approach for international cybersecurity norm development

机译:迫在眉睫:国际网络安全规范制定的新方法

获取原文

摘要

Over the last few years, the international community has devoted much attention to the topic of "international cyber norms". However, there appears to be a fundamental tension between these norm-development efforts and their real-world application as effective tools to reduce cyber risk and deter or prevent malicious state and non-state actors. Furthermore, in the current geopolitical climate, a broad agreement on global cyber norms seems improbable, as suggested by the lack of consensus in the course of the UN GGE 2017 process. In the meantime, government officials tasked with developing and deploying cybersecurity policy and law face day-to-day challenges and are operating on a different track. Questions continuously arise with respect to the role of the state in formulating cybersecurity standards, information sharing, active defense and privacy protection. These questions are dealt with mostly in the "civilian" cybersecurity sphere and are occurring largely under the radar of the global "international cyber norms" community. Against this backdrop, the paper suggests a shift in the approach to cyber norms. Its central thesis is that, at this juncture, rather than attempting to create a set of pre-defined aspirational norms aimed at achieving global stability, the international community should pay greater attention to discussions that are already occurring between cybersecurity regulators/authorities and should proactively support such discussions. Incremental and "bottom-up" processes, covering technical, policy and legal challenges at the domestic level, create fertile grounds for discussions that can be scaled up. This civilian, bottom-up approach is admittedly more mundane than the “aspirational cyber norms” track. Both tracks can and should continue to coexist in parallel, though the “civilian” track is more likely to result in a common taxonomy, legal/policy interoperability or common understandings that states can readily endorse, all of which could potentially ultimately lead to norms that enhance cybersecurity more pragmatically.
机译:在过去的几年中,国际社会一直非常关注“国际网络规范”这一主题。但是,这些规范制定工作与它们在现实世界中的应用之间似乎存在着根本性的张力,它们是减少网络风险并阻止或阻止恶意的国家和非国家行为者的有效工具。此外,在当前的地缘政治气候下,就全球网络规范达成广泛的协议似乎是不可能的,正如在联合国GGE 2017进程中缺乏共识所表明的那样。同时,负责制定和部署网络安全政策和法律的政府官员面临日常挑战,并在不同的道路上开展工作。关于国家在制定网络安全标准,信息共享,积极防御和隐私保护方面的作用,问题不断出现。这些问题大部分在“平民”网络安全领域中处理,并且在全球“国际网络规范”社区的关注下大量发生。在这种背景下,本文提出了网络规范方法的转变。其中心论点是,在此关头,国际社会不应试图建立一套旨在实现全球稳定的预定理想规范,而应更加关注网络安全监管机构/当局之间已经进行的讨论,并应积极主动地开展工作。支持这样的讨论。涉及国内层面技术,政策和法律挑战的渐进式和“自下而上”的流程为扩大规模的讨论创造了沃土。公认的是,这种平民化,自下而上的方法比“理想的网络规范”更为平凡。两条路线可以并且应该继续并行共存,尽管“平民”路线更可能导致共同的分类法,法律/政策的互操作性或国家可以轻易认可的共识,所有这些最终都可能最终导致规范的产生。更加务实地提高网络安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号