首页> 外文会议>Annual technical meeting of the Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology >Square vs Rectangular Control Vibration Testing of an Aerodynamically Excited Structure
【24h】

Square vs Rectangular Control Vibration Testing of an Aerodynamically Excited Structure

机译:气动激励结构的平方与矩形控制振动测试

获取原文

摘要

1. Rectangular control offers significant benefits over Square control in simulating vibration caused by a distributed loading 2. Huge reductions in the over-test across the test structure 2.1. Global vibration responses much more representative 2.2 Any single degree of freedom may have not be as a good you could achieve with a different control strategy 3. Significant reductions in peak force requirements 3.1 This can lead to big cost savings, both in infrastructure and operating costs.
机译:1.在模拟由分散载荷引起的振动时,矩形控制比方型控制具有明显优势。2.整个测试结构2.1的过度测试都大大减少了。全球振动响应更具代表性2.2使用不同的控制策略可能无法达到任何单一的自由度。3.峰值力需求的显着降低3.1这可以节省大量基础结构和运营成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号