首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies >From WannaCry to WannaDie: Security trade-offs and design for implantable medical devices
【24h】

From WannaCry to WannaDie: Security trade-offs and design for implantable medical devices

机译:从WannaCry到WannaDie:可植入医疗设备的安全权衡和设计

获取原文

摘要

Healthcare sectors are increasingly facing cyber security challenges and threats from adversaries due to numerous security flaws and the lack of security safeguards in medical devices. Among these medical devices and systems, security issues that concern implantable medical devices (IMDs) have attracted attention from both academia and the industry. In this paper, we discuss security vulnerabilities in current IMD products by presenting security tests and demonstrations performed by researchers. Based on this, three critical trade-offs in the IMD security design are analyzed, namely security vs. accessibility in medical emergencies, emergency access vs. checkup access and strong security requirements vs. limited IMD resources. Biometrics based security solutions can provide support for emergency access and thus are surveyed, including those using electrocardiogram signals, iris and fingerprints. During the design, we propose to adopt the concept of decoupled design and usable security in order to develop a viable security solution for the IMDs.
机译:由于众多安全漏洞和医疗设备缺乏安全保障,医疗保健部门正日益面临网络安全挑战和来自对手的威胁。在这些医疗设备和系统中,涉及植入式医疗设备(IMD)的安全性问题已引起学术界和行业的关注。在本文中,我们将通过介绍研究人员进行的安全测试和演示来讨论当前IMD产品中的安全漏洞。在此基础上,分析了IMD安全设计中的三个关键权衡,即医疗紧急情况中的安全性与可访问性,紧急访问与检查访问以及强大的安全性要求与有限的IMD资源。基于生物识别技术的安全解决方案可以为紧急访问提供支持,因此可以进行调查,包括那些使用心电图信号,虹膜和指纹的解决方案。在设计过程中,我们建议采用分离设计和可用安全性的概念,以便为IMD开发可行的安全性解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号