首页> 外文会议>International conference on Internet science >Politicians Driving Online Discussions: Are Institutionalized Influencers Top Twitter Users?
【24h】

Politicians Driving Online Discussions: Are Institutionalized Influencers Top Twitter Users?

机译:政客推动在线讨论:制度化影响者是Twitter的主要用户吗?

获取原文

摘要

Embeddedness of politicians and political organizations in a discussion defines its level of institutionalization and creates a public arena for collaboration between publics and institutional actors. Thus, testing whether traditional hierarchies (in terms of presence of politically institutionalized actors) show up in online discussions deserves scholarly research. Moreover, it is also important to see whether more democratic societies show patterns of public involvement of politically institutionalized users that would differ from those in more authoritarian contexts. To assess the 'influencer' status of politically institutionalized actors on Twitter cross-culturally, we have selected conflictual Twitter discussions in Germany, the USA, and Russia, all based on violent inter-ethnic clashes. Using vocabulary-based web crawling, we collected data on them and formed samples of top users selected by four activity metrics and five network metrics, to assess the positions of political users in the top lists and correlations of user status with their top list ranks. To this, we added qualitative assessment of presence of political users in comparative perspective. Our results show that, in all the cases, presence of political actors in online discussions is scarce; also, political actors tend to fail to link user groups or stay in the center of discussion. There is also meaningful divergence of Russia from the pattern that Germany and the USA show: while in these countries politicians gain user attention based on content, in Russia it is the status itself that matters, and political users tend to gain weight in the discussion structure despite low attention levels.
机译:政治家和政治组织在讨论中的嵌入性定义了其制度化的程度,并为公众和机构参与者之间的合作创造了公共场所。因此,测试在线讨论中是否出现传统的等级制度(就政治制度化参与者的存在而言)值得进行学术研究。此外,同样重要的是,观察更多的民主社会是否显示出政治上制度化的使用者的公众参与模式,这与威权主义背景下的公众参与模式有所不同。为了评估跨文化的Twitter上政治制度化参与者的“影响者”地位,我们选择了在德国,美国和俄罗斯进行的有争议的Twitter讨论,这些讨论都是基于种族间的暴力冲突。使用基于词汇的网络爬虫,我们收集了有关它们的数据,并形成了由四个活动指标和五个网络指标选择的顶级用户的样本,以评估政治用户在顶级列表中的位置以及用户状态与顶级列表排名的相关性。为此,我们从比较的角度添加了对政治用户存在的定性评估。我们的结果表明,在所有情况下,在线讨论中很少有政治人物在场。同样,政治参与者往往无法将用户群体联系起来或停留在讨​​论的中心。俄罗斯与德国和美国所表现出的模式也存在着有意义的分歧:尽管在这些国家中,政客基于内容获得用户的关注,但在俄罗斯,地位本身才是重要的,而政治用户则倾向于在讨论结构中加重权重尽管关注度很低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号