首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks >A statistical analysis of transparent optical networks comparing merit of fiber types and elastic transceivers
【24h】

A statistical analysis of transparent optical networks comparing merit of fiber types and elastic transceivers

机译:透明光网络的统计分析,比较光纤类型和弹性收发器的优点

获取原文

摘要

We perform a benchmarking of three different fiber types and two different implementation of flexible rate transceivers in a fixed-grid reconfigurable transparent optical network scenario. Results are obtained through a Monte Carlo based method called the Statistical Network Assessment Process (SNAP). Using the SNAP framework, we derive the statistics of the average bitrate per lightpath on a Pan European network scenario. We consider the average of such metric as a unique merit parameter to compare the use SMF, PSCF or NZDSF. We also consider two different implementations of elastic transceivers, namely one based on pure PM-M-QAM and the other using Time Division Hybrid Modulation Formats (TDHMF). TDHMF always outperforms PM-M-QAM, of 23% in SMF and PSCF and of 27% in the poorer transmission quality NZDSF. Results show that using flexible PM-M-QAM, PSCF are able to support a capacity increase in terms of average bitrate per LP of 48% with respect to NZDSF, while the improvement granted by SMF is 34%.
机译:在固定网格可重新配置的透明光网络情况下,我们对三种不同的光纤类型和两种不同的灵活速率收发器实施方案进行基准测试。通过基于蒙特卡洛的方法(称为统计网络评估过程(SNAP))获得结果。使用SNAP框架,我们可以得出泛欧洲网络场景下每个光路径的平均比特率的统计信息。我们将此类指标的平均值视为唯一的优值参数,以比较SMF,PSCF或NZDSF的使用情况。我们还考虑了两种不同的弹性收发器实现,一种是基于纯PM-M-QAM,另一种是使用时分混合调制格式(TDHMF)。 TDHMF始终胜过PM-M-QAM,在SMF和PSCF中达到23%,在传输质量较差的NZDSF中达到27%。结果表明,使用灵活的PM-M-QAM,相对于NZDSF,PSCF能够支持每LP平均比特率48%的容量增加,而SMF所给予的改善是34%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号