首页> 外文会议>Theory of Cryptography Conference >Contention in Cryptoland: Obfuscation, Leakage and UCE
【24h】

Contention in Cryptoland: Obfuscation, Leakage and UCE

机译:隐地争夺:混淆,泄漏和UCE

获取原文

摘要

This paper addresses the fundamental question of whether or not different, exciting primitives now being considered actually exist. We show that we, unfortunately, cannot have them all. We provide results of the form -A∨-B, meaning one of the primitives A, B cannot exist. (But we don't know which.) Specifically, we show that: (1) VGBO (Virtual Grey Box Obfuscation) for all circuits, which has been conjectured to be achieved by candidate constructions, cannot co-exist with Canaletto's 1997 AI-DHI (auxiliary input DH inversion) assumption, which has been used to achieve many goals including point-function obfuscation (2) iO (indistinguishability obfuscation) for all circuits cannot co-exist with KM-LR-SE (key-message leakage-resilient symmetric encryption) (3) iO cannot co-exist with hash functions that are UCE secure for computationally unpredictable split sources.
机译:本文提出了一个基本问题,即现在是否确实存在不同的,令人兴奋的原语。我们表明,不幸的是,我们不能全部拥有它们。我们提供形式为-A∨-B的结果,这意味着基元A,B之一不存在。 (但我们不知道。)具体来说,我们表明:(1)所有电路的VGBO(虚拟灰盒模糊处理)已被推测是由候选构造实现的,不能与Canaletto的1997 AI-共存。 DHI(辅助输入DH倒置)假设已用于实现许多目标,包括点函数混淆(2)所有电路的iO(不可区分混淆)不能与KM-LR-SE(关键消息泄漏恢复能力)共存(3)iO无法与UCE安全的哈希函数共存,用于计算不可预测的拆分源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号