首页> 外文会议>China satellite navigation conference >The Methods and Analysis of Zero Baseline and Ultra-Short Baseline Ambiguity Resolution Based on BDS Observations
【24h】

The Methods and Analysis of Zero Baseline and Ultra-Short Baseline Ambiguity Resolution Based on BDS Observations

机译:基于BDS观测的零基线和超短基线歧义度解析方法与分析

获取原文

摘要

Integer ambiguity resolution is one of the difficult and important points in precision relative positioning. As we all know, LAMBDA (Least-squares AMBiguity Decorrelation Adjustment) method can be regard as the most rigorous algorithm in ambiguity resolution methods, it is still effective in the ambiguity resolution of triple-frequency GNSS precision positioning. So, the algorithms such as LAMBDA, Rounding, and Bootstrapping are adopted in this paper to solve the zero baseline and ultra-short baseline BDS observations, respectively, and the results of ambiguities resolution for pseudorange and carrier-phase double difference observations and increments of ENU direction for baselines are obtained, which the C01 satellite is taken as reference satellite in the whole baselines resolution. Through comparing the consequences of ambiguity resolution and the difference for increment of ENU direction between the three methods and TBC (Trimble Business Center) software, results show that performance of the three methods is at the same level, therefore both of them can be used for ambiguity resolution of zero baseline and ultra-short baseline.
机译:整数模糊度解析是精确相对定位中的难点和重要点之一。众所周知,LAMBDA(最小二乘AMBiguity去相关调整)方法可以被视为歧义解决方法中最严格的算法,在三频GNSS精确定位的歧义解决中仍然有效。因此,本文采用LAMBDA,Rounding和Bootstrapping等算法分别求解零基线和超短基线BDS观测值,以及伪距和载波相位双差观测值的歧义分辨率结果以及获得基线的ENU方向,将C01卫星作为整个基线分辨率中的参考卫星。通过比较歧义解决的后果以及三种方法与TBC(Trimble Business Center)软件之间ENU方向增量的差异,结果表明这三种方法的性能处于同一水平,因此它们都可以用于零基线和超短基线的歧义解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号