首页> 外文会议>IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics >Comparative Analysis of Scientific Publications of Research Entities Using Multiple Disciplinary Classifications
【24h】

Comparative Analysis of Scientific Publications of Research Entities Using Multiple Disciplinary Classifications

机译:使用多种学科分类对研究实体的科学出版物进行比较分析

获取原文

摘要

This study attempts a comparative disciplinary analysis of a Web of Science (WoS) recorded dataset (ca. 15,000 core journal articles and reviews) of real publications for 5-years period by the research departments, dedicated to science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM), of a comprehensive university using different disciplinary schemes: Essential Science Indicators (ESI) 22 research fields, SCOPUS 27 subject areas and OECD Frascati 38 subordinate research fields. It demonstrates that assigning the publications to departments and disciplines followed by correspondence analysis and clustering of the contingency table comprising disciplinary share of publications results in enhanced understanding and visualization of the research output at different levels of disciplinary or research entities. Such exercise improves creation of publication subsets (for different research entities and disciplinary schemes) for further processing, visualization and interpretation with sophisticated bibliometric/scientometric tools including the science mapping techniques.
机译:这项研究尝试对研究部门(致力于科学,技术,工程,数学,和医学(STEMM),这是一所采用不同学科计划的综合性大学:基本科学指标(ESI)22个研究领域,SCOPUS 27个学科领域和OECD Frascati 38个从属研究领域。它表明,将出版物分配给各部门和学科,然后进行对应分析和对包括出版物学科份额在内的列联表进行聚类,可以增强对学科或研究实体不同级别的研究成果的理解和可视化。这样的练习可以改进出版物子集(针对不同的研究实体和学科计划)的创建,以便使用包括科学制图技术在内的复杂的文献计量/科学计量工具进一步处理,可视化和解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号