首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing >Measuring Quality of Collaboratively Edited Documents: The Case of Wikipedia
【24h】

Measuring Quality of Collaboratively Edited Documents: The Case of Wikipedia

机译:测量协作编辑文档的质量:以Wikipedia为例

获取原文

摘要

Wikipedia is a great example of large scale collaboration, where people from all over the world together build the largest and maybe the most important human knowledge repository in the history. However, a number of studies showed that the quality of Wikipedia articles is not equally distributed. While many articles are of good quality, many others need to be improved. Assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles is very important for guiding readers towards articles of high quality and suggesting authors and reviewers which articles need to be improved. Due to the huge size of Wikipedia, an effective automatic assessment method to measure Wikipedia articles quality is needed. In this paper, we present an automatic assessment method of Wikipedia articles quality by analyzing their content in terms of their format features and readability scores. Our results show improvements both in terms of accuracy and information gain compared with other existing approaches.
机译:维基百科是大规模协作的一个很好的例子,来自世界各地的人们共同建立了历史上最大,甚至最重要的人类知识库。但是,许多研究表明,维基百科文章的质量分布不均。尽管许多文章的质量很高,但还有许多其他文章需要改进。评估Wikipedia文章的质量对于指导读者阅读高质量的文章并向作者和评论者建议需要改进的文章非常重要。由于Wikipedia的规模庞大,因此需要一种有效的自动评估方法来衡量Wikipedia文章的质量。在本文中,我们通过分析其内容的格式特征和可读性得分,提出了一种自动评估维基百科文章质量的方法。我们的结果表明,与其他现有方法相比,在准确性和信息获取方面都有改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号