首页> 外文会议>ASME international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering >ECA FOR GIRTH WELDS OF OFFSHORE PIPELINES: A MODIFIED BS7910 ANALYTICAL APPROACH VS 3D FE ANALYSES
【24h】

ECA FOR GIRTH WELDS OF OFFSHORE PIPELINES: A MODIFIED BS7910 ANALYTICAL APPROACH VS 3D FE ANALYSES

机译:海上管道环行的ECA:经过改进的BS7910分析方法与3D FE分析

获取原文

摘要

In the last decade new standards or revisions of existing guidelines have been launched on the subject. Among those, BS 7910 (now in edition 2013) and DNV-OS-F101 (now in edition 2013) are considered as reference in many world offshore districts of the Oil & Gas Industry. What is peculiar in offshore pipelines with respect to pressure vessel or nuclear plants, for which an engineering criticality assessment (ECA) was first established, it is the fact that in many circumstances offshore pipelines exceed the elastic limit (global pipe bending is a primary stress that causes mainly membrane stress through the pipe wall). This implies the extension of a stress based ECA into a strain based ECA, further including the bi-axial state of stress, caused by the presence of internal pressure and hoop stresses. An important step of ECA is the definition of loads and load effects at pipe girth weld, from global applied loads on the pipeline to the local effects at the crack. Finite elements (FE) are currently used to develop the relevant bending moment stress vs. strain relationship for the given pipe diameter, wall thickness and materials, both parent pipe and weld. Related longitudinal stress distribution on the pipe cross section without flaws in the weld is calculated for different pipe life stages (installation, pressure test and operation). The calculated global (or far from the flaw) longitudinal stress distribution is an input for the ECA analysis. For this aspect the new DNV OS-F101 (2013) has reviewed the appendix A requiring the use of 3D FE analyses to account for the effect of the internal pressure on the Crack Driving Force (CDF). In this paper it is discussed an analytical approach both to assess the pipeline strength in presence of flaws in the girth welds of offshore pipelines and to define defect acceptance criteria for specific new projects. The approach follows the framework of BS7910 and of DNV OS-F101 and includes load conditions under both installation and operation. In particular specific 3D FE analyses are presented to enforce the applicability of the proposed analytical approach.
机译:在过去的十年中,针对该主题推出了新的标准或对现有指南的修订。其中,BS 7910(现在是2013版)和DNV-OS-F101(现在是2013版)在石油和天然气行业的许多世界近海地区被认为是参考。相对于压力容器或核电厂而言,海上管道的特殊之处在于,首先建立了工程关键性评估(ECA),这是事实,在许多情况下,海上管道都超过了弹性极限(整体管道弯曲是主要的​​应力)。这主要导致穿过管壁的膜应力)。这意味着将基于应力的ECA扩展为基于应变的ECA,还包括由于内部压力和环向应力的存在而导致的双轴应力状态。 ECA的重要一步是定义管道环缝处的载荷和载荷效应,从管道上的整体施加载荷到裂缝处的局部效应。对于给定的管道直径,壁厚和材料(母管道和焊缝),目前使用有限元(FE)来建立相关的弯矩应力与应变的关系。针对不同的管道寿命阶段(安装,压力测试和操作),计算了在管道横截面上无焊缝缺陷的相关纵向应力分布。计算出的整体(或远离裂纹)纵向应力分布是ECA分析的输入。为此,新的DNV OS-F101(2013)审查了附录A,要求使用3D FE分析来说明内部压力对裂纹驱动力(CDF)的影响。本文讨论了一种分析方法,既可以评估海上管道环缝焊缝中存在缺陷的管道强度,也可以为特定的新项目定义缺陷验收标准。该方法遵循BS7910和DNV OS-F101的框架,并包括安装和操作时的负载条件。特别地,提出了特定的3D FE分析以增强所提出的分析方法的适用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号