首页> 外文会议>IAEE international conference;International Association for Energy Economics >CAP PRICES OR CAP REVENUES? THE IMPLICATIONS OF ALTERNATIVE ELECTRICITY PRICING SCHEMES IN JAMAICA
【24h】

CAP PRICES OR CAP REVENUES? THE IMPLICATIONS OF ALTERNATIVE ELECTRICITY PRICING SCHEMES IN JAMAICA

机译:帽价格或帽收入?牙买加替代电力定价方案的含义

获取原文

摘要

Though the study is limited to a static model, it does confirm the price cap regime as a superior model to revenue cap regulation. If a revenue cap is expected to encourage energy efficiency, it does so at the expense of efficient price setting. Price cap regulation and energy efficiency can co-exist if the regulated monopolist provides energy services alongside electricity. Changing from a price cap scheme to a revenue cap scheme will create welfare losses for society. Therefore, a price cap system based on Ramsey pricing represents the second-best solution that will deliver the greatest societal benefits.In addition to the introduction of cost and demand uncertainty, future work will examine the differences in both schemes when a cap is imposed for more than one period. Specifically, I will consider the case where the plan resets every five years, which is typical in most jurisdictions.
机译:尽管该研究仅限于静态模型,但它确实确认了价格上限制度是收入上限监管的一种较好模型。如果预期收入上限会鼓励能源效率,那么这样做会以有效的价格制定为代价。如果受监管的垄断者与电力一起提供能源服务,则价格上限监管和能源效率可以共存。从价格上限计划转变为收入上限计划将给社会造成福利损失。因此,基于Ramsey定价的价格上限系统代表了第二好的解决方案,它将带来最大的社会效益。 除了引入成本和需求不确定性之外,未来的工作还将研究在施加超过一个期限的上限时两种方案的差异。具体来说,我将考虑该计划每五年重置一次的情况,这在大多数司法管辖区都是典型的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号