【24h】

POLICY ASSESSMENT FOR LOW CARBON ELECTRICITY MARKETS

机译:低碳电力市场的政策评估

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Results indicate that if the aim of policy is to reduce emissions, then the carbon tax scenario presents interesting options, as this affects the capacity of fossil fuel technologies, with high GHGs emissions. The feed-in tariff policy focuses on expanding the capacity of clean technologies without affecting fossil fuel technologies as much. When both carbon tax policy and the incentives policy are applied simultaneously, they have a greater impact on both emission reductions and the diffusion of clean technologies, and yet they do not necessarily bring high electricity prices. The reason is that a significant portion of renewable energy (not including hydroelectricity) replaces fossil-fuelled technologies, and in the long-term electricity price decreases, given that generation costs of renewable technologies are then lower, and also as a result of the effects of progress along their learning curves.Policies for the demand side reduce sussesfully electricity demand. The reduction of electricity demand decreases market share of fossil fuels technologies.
机译:结果表明,如果政策的目标是减少排放,那么碳税方案提供了有趣的选择,因为这会影响具有高温室气体排放量的化石燃料技术的能力。上网电价政策着重于扩大清洁技术的能力,而又不影响化石燃料技术。当同时实施碳税政策和激励政策时,它们对减排和清洁技术的传播都具有更大的影响,但不一定带来高电价。原因是可再生能源(不包括水电)的很大一部分替代了以化石燃料为燃料的技术,并且从长期来看,由于可再生技术的发电成本较低,并且也是这种影响的结果,电价下降了需求方的政策可减少可疑的电力需求。电力需求的减少降低了化石燃料技术的市场份额。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号