首页> 外文会议>Chinese Control and Decision Conference >Adaptive inventory control and bullwhip effect analysis for supply chains with non-stationary demand
【24h】

Adaptive inventory control and bullwhip effect analysis for supply chains with non-stationary demand

机译:非平稳需求的供应链的自适应库存控制和牛鞭效应分析

获取原文

摘要

In this paper, two adaptive inventory control models, i.e. centralized and decentralized respectively, for a multi-echelon multi-cycle supply chain consisting of one supplier and one retailer with non-stationary stochastic demand were established. In the centralized model, the vendor managed inventory replenishment policy was used by the supplier and the retailer didn't keep any stock. An improved exponential smoothing method was used by the supplier to forecast the future demand. The EOQ model was used by the supplier to determine the replenishment quantity for the retailer and an adaptive approach was used by the supplier to determine his safety stock to against demand fluctuation. An reinforcement learning algorithm was adopted to select an proper safety factor according to the stochastic demand. On the contrary, in the decentralized model, both the supplier and the retailers hold their own inventory and safety stock for themselves respectively. That is, they control their own inventory independently. In both cases, the aim is to satisfy the given target service level predefined. In our simulation study, two types of demand patterns, stationary and non-stationary demand, are considered respectively. The bullwhip effect generated in the course of forecasting and processing of demand information were analyzed. The results show that the proposed method can satisfy the given service level and mitigate the bullwhip effect to some extent.
机译:本文建立了一个由一个供应商和一个具有随机需求的零售商组成的多级多周期供应链的两个自适应库存控制模型,分别是集中式和分散式。在集中式模型中,供应商使用了卖方管理的库存补货策略,而零售商则没有保留任何库存。供应商使用一种改进的指数平滑方法来预测未来需求。供应商使用EOQ模型来确定零售商的补货数量,供应商使用自适应方法来确定其安全库存以应对需求波动。根据随机需求,采用强化学习算法选择合适的安全系数。相反,在分散模型中,供应商和零售商都各自拥有自己的库存和安全库存。也就是说,他们独立控制自己的库存。在这两种情况下,目的都是要满足给定的预定目标服务水平。在我们的模拟研究中,分别考虑了两种类型的需求模式:固定需求和非固定需求。分析了需求信息的预测和处理过程中产生的牛鞭效应。结果表明,该方法能够满足给定的服务水平,并在一定程度上减轻了牛鞭效应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号