首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology >BENCH-KJ: BENCHMARK ON ANALYTICAL CALCULATION OF FRACTURE MECHANICS PARAMETERS K_I AND J FOR CRACKED PIPING COMPONENTS - FINAL RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
【24h】

BENCH-KJ: BENCHMARK ON ANALYTICAL CALCULATION OF FRACTURE MECHANICS PARAMETERS K_I AND J FOR CRACKED PIPING COMPONENTS - FINAL RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

机译:BENCH-KJ:裂纹管件断裂力学参数K_I和J的分析计算基准—最终结果和结论

获取原文

摘要

For most of design codes and for ageing consideration, fracture mechanics is needed to evaluate the integrity of cracked components. The major parameters used in this kind of analysis are K and J. In this frame, different international codes (RSE-M appendix 5.4, RCC-MRx appendix A16, R6 rule, ASME B&PV Code Section XI, API 579, VERLIFE, Russian Code...) propose compendia for stress intensity factors, and, for some of them, compendia for limit loads for usual situations, in terms of component geometry, type of defect and loading conditions. The benchmark « bench-KJ », proposed in the frame of the OECD/IAGE Group, aims to compare these different estimation schemes regarding of in comparison to available reference results done by Finite Element Method for representative cases (pipes and elbows submitted to mechanical or/and thermal loadings, considering various type and size of cracks). Twenty-nine partners are globally involved in this benchmark, the level of their contribution depending on the considered technical task. The benchmark covers simple cases with basic mechanical loads like pressure and bending up to complex loading combinations, but also complex geometries (pipes and elbows) including cladding or welds; all these cases are classified into 6 technical tasks: elastic stress intensity factors calculation (task 1), J calculation in cracked pipes (tasks 2 and 3), then in cracked elbows (task 4), and finally J in some particular cases (task 5) and in weld (task 6). This paper presents the final results of the benchmark in terms of global comparison between different codes.
机译:对于大多数设计规范和老化考虑,需要断裂力学来评估破裂部件的完整性。这种分析中使用的主要参数是K和J。在此框架中,使用了不同的国际代码(RSE-M附录5.4,RCC-MRx附录A16,R6规则,ASME B&PV代码第XI节,API 579,VERLIFE,俄语代码...)提出关于应力强度因子的纲要,对于某些情况,就组件几何形状,缺陷类型和载荷条件而言,针对通常情况下的极限载荷提出纲要。在OECD / IAGE组的框架中提出的基准«Bench-KJ»旨在比较关于的这些不同的估算方案,并与有限元方法针对代表性案例(管道和弯头提交给机械或机械手)进行的可用参考结果进行比较。 /和热负荷,并考虑各种类型和尺寸的裂纹)。全球共有29个合作伙伴参与此基准测试,其贡献水平取决于所考虑的技术任务。该基准测试涵盖了具有基本机械载荷(例如压力和弯曲到复杂载荷组合)的简单情况,还包括包括包层或焊缝在内的复杂几何形状(管道和弯头);所有这些情况都分为6个技术任务:弹性应力强度因子计算(任务1),裂管中的J计算(任务2和3),裂肘中的J计算(任务4),以及某些特殊情况下的J(任务4) 5)和焊接中(任务6)。本文根据不同代码之间的全局比较,介绍了基准测试的最终结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号