首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference >Bug report, feature request, or simply praise? On automatically classifying app reviews
【24h】

Bug report, feature request, or simply praise? On automatically classifying app reviews

机译:错误报告,功能要求或仅仅是赞美?自动分类应用评论

获取原文

摘要

App stores like Google Play and Apple AppStore have over 3 Million apps covering nearly every kind of software and service. Billions of users regularly download, use, and review these apps. Recent studies have shown that reviews written by the users represent a rich source of information for the app vendors and the developers, as they include information about bugs, ideas for new features, or documentation of released features. This paper introduces several probabilistic techniques to classify app reviews into four types: bug reports, feature requests, user experiences, and ratings. For this we use review metadata such as the star rating and the tense, as well as, text classification, natural language processing, and sentiment analysis techniques. We conducted a series of experiments to compare the accuracy of the techniques and compared them with simple string matching. We found that metadata alone results in a poor classification accuracy. When combined with natural language processing, the classification precision got between 70-95% while the recall between 80-90%. Multiple binary classifiers outperformed single multiclass classifiers. Our results impact the design of review analytics tools which help app vendors, developers, and users to deal with the large amount of reviews, filter critical reviews, and assign them to the appropriate stakeholders.
机译:像Google Play和Apple AppStore这样的应用程序商店拥有超过300万个应用程序,几乎涵盖了每种软件和服务。数十亿用户定期下载,使用和查看这些应用程序。最近的研究表明,用户撰写的评论为应用程序供应商和开发人员提供了丰富的信息来源,因为它们包括有关错误的信息,新功能的想法或已发布功能的文档。本文介绍了几种概率技术,可将应用程序评论分为四种类型:错误报告,功能请求,用户体验和评级。为此,我们使用评论元数据,例如星级和时态,以及文本分类,自然语言处理和情感分析技术。我们进行了一系列实验来比较这些技术的准确性,并将它们与简单的字符串匹配进行比较。我们发现仅元数据会导致较差的分类准确性。当结合自然语言处理时,分类精度在70-95%之间,而召回率在80-90%之间。多个二元分类器优于单个多分类器。我们的结果影响了评论分析工具的设计,该工具可帮助应用程序供应商,开发人员和用户处理大量评论,过滤重要评论并将其分配给适当的利益相关者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号