首页> 外文会议>International conference on transportation engineering >Optimal Ordering Policy of Competitive Retailers with Different Risk Preferences
【24h】

Optimal Ordering Policy of Competitive Retailers with Different Risk Preferences

机译:具有不同风险偏好的竞争性零售商的最优订购策略

获取原文

摘要

The study investigates the optimal ordering policies of two competitive retailers, one is risk-neutral, another is loss-averse. Because of different scale and credit, Risk-neutral retailers aim for maximum expected profit, while loss-averse retailers targets maximum expected utility. We establish the optimal ordering policies model for the two kinds of retailers whose demand is random and alternative, And proved the existence and uniqueness of the optimal order quantity. Then we carry on the mathematical experimentation with the uniform distribution function, The analysis revealed that when the degree of retailers' lose-averse coefficient increases, their optimal volume of ordering is reducing, while the corresponding risk-neutral competitor's optimal volume of ordering is increasing. But their total volume of ordering is reducing, The scope is becoming slower; when the risk-neutral retailers' wholesale price is falling, their optimal volume of ordering is increasing, while the corresponding the lose-aversion's optimal volume of ordering is just the opposite. But their total volume of ordering is increasing, The growth is becoming slower too.
机译:该研究调查了两家竞争性零售商的最优订购策略,一种是风险中性的,另一种是规避损失的。由于规模和信誉不同,风险中性零售商的目标是最大预期利润,而厌恶风险的零售商的目标是最大预期效用。建立了需求随机且交替的两种零售商的最优订货策略模型,并证明了最优订货量的存在性和唯一性。然后我们用均匀分布函数进行了数学实验,分析表明,当零售商的规避厌恶系数的程度增加时,他们的最优订货量就减少,而相应的风险中立竞争者的最优订货量却在增加。 。但是他们的订购总量却在减少,范围正在变慢;当风险中性零售商的批发价格下降时,他们的最佳订货量就在增加,而相应的损失厌恶者的最佳订货量正好相反。但是他们的总订购量在增加,增长也越来越慢。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号