首页> 外文会议>Conference on applications of digital image processing >Comparative Assessment of H.265/MPEG-HEVC, VP9, and H.264/MPEG-AVC Encoders for Low-Delay Video Applications
【24h】

Comparative Assessment of H.265/MPEG-HEVC, VP9, and H.264/MPEG-AVC Encoders for Low-Delay Video Applications

机译:针对低延迟视频应用的H.265 / MPEG-HEVC,VP9和H.264 / MPEG-AVC编码器的比较评估

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The popularity of low-delay video applications dramatically increased over the last years due to a rising demand for realtime video content (such as video conferencing or video surveillance), and also due to the increasing availability of relatively inexpensive heterogeneous devices (such as smartphones and tablets). To this end, this work presents a comparative assessment of the two latest video coding standards: H.265/MPEG-HEVC (High-Efficiency Video Coding), H.264/MPEG-AVC (Advanced Video Coding), and also of the VP9 proprietary video coding scheme. For evaluating H.264/MPEG-AVC, an open-source x264 encoder was selected, which has a multi-pass encoding mode, similarly to VP9. According to experimental results, which were obtained by using similar low-delay configurations for all three examined representative encoders, it was observed that H.265/MPEG-HEVC provides significant average bit-rate savings of 32.5%, and 40.8%, relative to VP9 and x264 for the 1-pass encoding, and average bit-rate savings of 32.6%, and 42.2% for the 2-pass encoding, respectively. On the other hand, compared to the x264 encoder, typical low-delay encoding times of the VP9 encoder, are about 2,000 times higher for the 1-pass encoding, and are about 400 times higher for the 2-pass encoding.
机译:由于对实时视频内容(例如视频会议或视频监视)的需求不断增加,以及相对便宜的异构设备(例如智能手机和平板电脑)。为此,这项工作对两种最新的视频编码标准进行了比较评估:H.265 / MPEG-HEVC(高效视频编码),H.264 / MPEG-AVC(高级视频编码)以及VP9专有视频编码方案。为了评估H.264 / MPEG-AVC,选择了开源x264编码器,该编码器具有类似于VP9的多遍编码模式。根据对所有三个受检查的代表性编码器使用类似的低延迟配置所获得的实验结果,可以观察到,相对于H.265 / MPEG-HEVC,H.265 / MPEG-HEVC的平均平均比特率节省了32.5%和40.8%。 VP9和x264用于1次通过编码,平均比特率节省分别为32.6%和42.2%(对于2次通过编码)。另一方面,与x264编码器相比,VP9编码器的典型低延迟编码时间对于1遍编码大约高2,000倍,对于2遍编码大约高400倍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号