首页> 外文会议>IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference >Comparison of trend extraction methods for calculating performance loss rates of different photovoltaic technologies
【24h】

Comparison of trend extraction methods for calculating performance loss rates of different photovoltaic technologies

机译:计算不同光伏技术性能损失率的趋势提取方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

In this work, the performance loss rates of eleven grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) systems of different technologies were evaluated by applying linear regression (LR) and trend extraction methods to Performance Ratio, R, time series. In particular, model-based methods such as Classical Seasonal Decomposition (CSD), Holt-Winters (HW) exponential smoothing and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), as well as non-parametric filtering methods such as LOcally wEighted Scatterplot Smoothing (LOESS) were used to extract the trend from monthly R time series of the first five years of operation of each PV system. The results showed that applying LR on the time series produced the lowest performance loss rates for most systems, but with significant autocorrelations in the residuals, signifying statistical inaccuracy. The application of CSD and HW significantly reduced the residual autocorrelations as the seasonal component was extracted from the time series, resulting in comparable results for eight out of eleven PV systems, with a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 6.22 % between the performance loss rates calculated from each method. Finally, the optimal use of multiplicative ARIMA resulted in Gaussian white noise (GWN) residuals and the most accurate statistical model of the R time series. ARIMA produced higher performance loss rates than LR for all technologies, except the amorphous Silicon (a-Si) system. The LOESS non-parametric method produced directly comparable results to multiplicative ARIMA, with a MAPE of −2.04 % between the performance loss rates calculated from each method, whereas LR, CSD and HW showed higher deviation from ARIMA, with MAPE of 25.14 %, −13.71 % and −6.39 %, respectively.
机译:在这项工作中,通过将线性回归(LR)和趋势提取方法应用于性能比率R,时间序列,评估了11种不同技术的并网光伏(PV)系统的性能损失率。特别是基于模型的方法,例如古典季节性分解(CSD),Holt-Winters(HW)指数平滑和自回归综合移动平均值(ARIMA),以及非参数滤波方法,例如局部加权散点图平滑(LOESS)分别从每个光伏系统运行的前五年的每月R时间序列中提取趋势。结果表明,对大多数系统而言,在时间序列上应用LR产生的性能损失率最低,但残差具有显着的自相关性,表明统计上的不准确性。 CSD和HW的应用大大减少了残余自相关性,因为从时间序列中提取了季节性成分,从而在11个PV系统中有8个具有可比的结果,性能损失之间的平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)为6.22%每种方法计算出的费率。最后,乘法ARIMA的最佳使用导致了高斯白噪声(GWN)残差和R时间序列的最准确统计模型。除非晶硅(a-Si)系统外,对于所有技术,ARIMA的性能损失率均高于LR。 LOESS非参数方法产生的结果与乘法ARIMA直接可比,结果每种方法的性能损失率之间的MAPE为-2.04%,而LR,CSD和HW与ARIMA的偏差更大,MAPE为25.14%,-分别为13.71%和-6.39%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号