【24h】

Standardisation of MV substation configurations in HV/MV substations

机译:高压/中压变电站中中压变电站配置的标准化

获取原文

摘要

To serve the increasing use of electric power the electric power system has been developed in the past century. In the Stedin service area a significant amount of substations dated from the mid 60ties to the mid 80ties. Due to several reasons these substations are nominated to be replaced. Replacement of a substation gives the opportunity to reconsider the basic assumptions taken 40 years ago and adapt them to current needs.In this paper a standard MV (here: 10, 13 and 23kV) substation configuration is defined. Therefore five different busbar configurations are considered and evaluated via a multi criteria analysis. The results of the multi criteria analysis show that the two sections single and double busbar concept emerge dominantly. It can be concluded that:1. it is preferred to have two sections in separate rooms.2. the single busbar concepts scores slightly better than the double busbar concept.Applying a single busbar concept leads to straightforward distribution grid design which makes it possible to apply distribution automation functions, such as Self Healing Grids, more easily.These concepts are applied in a case study of the replacement of 50/10 kV substation Utrecht Leidseveer. In simulation software a reliability model of the current situation, application of two sections single busbar concept and the application of two sections double busbar concept have been setup. The reliability model has been used to evaluate the three concepts on the SAIFI and SAIDI parameters. For the single busbar concept is was necessary to adapt the distribution grid which is incorporated in the reliability model accordingly. It turned out that the single and double busbar concept perform better on the SAIFI parameter than the current situation. On the SAIDI parameter the current situation and the single busbar concept behave more or less the same while the double busbar concept performance is worse. On one hand this has to do with the operation of the current substation while on the other hand the healthy busbar is not directly available after a busbar failure in a double busbar system.The overall conclusion of this paper is that both the multi criteria analysis as well as the reliability evaluation of the busbar concepts show that the two section single busbar emerge best.
机译:为了服务于日益增长的电力使用,在过去的世纪中已经开发了电力系统。在Stedin服务区,从60年代中期到80年代中期,有大量的变电站。由于多种原因,这些变电站被提名更换。变电站的更换使人们有机会重新考虑40年前的基本假设,并使它们适应当前的需求。 在本文中,定义了标准的MV(此处为10、13和23kV)变电站配置。因此,可以通过多标准分析来考虑和评估五种不同的母线配置。多标准分析的结果表明,单母线和双母线这两个部分占主导地位。可以得出以下结论: 1.最好在单独的房间里有两个部分。 2.单母线概念的得分略高于双母线概念。 应用单个母线概念可实现直接的配电网设计,这使得更轻松地应用配电自动化功能(例如自修复网)成为可能。 将这些概念应用于替换50/10 kV乌特勒支莱兹韦尔变电站的案例研究中。在仿真软件中,建立了当前状况的可靠性模型,两节单母线概念的应用和两节双母线概念的应用。可靠性模型已用于评估SAIFI和SAIDI参数的三个概念。对于单母线的概念,有必要对配电网进行调整,配电网已相应地纳入可靠性模型中。事实证明,单母线和双母线概念在SAIFI参数上的性能要优于当前情况。在SAIDI参数上,当前情况和单母线概念的行为大致相同,而双母线概念的性能则较差。一方面,这与当前变电站的运行有关;另一方面,双母线系统中的母线故障后,无法直接使用正常的母线。 本文的总体结论是,多标准分析以及对母线概念的可靠性评估都表明,两段式单母线表现最佳。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号