首页> 外文会议>ASME international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering >QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT (QRA) OF AN EXPLORATORY DRILLING OIL SPILL IN DEEPWATER GULF OF MEXICO
【24h】

QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT (QRA) OF AN EXPLORATORY DRILLING OIL SPILL IN DEEPWATER GULF OF MEXICO

机译:墨西哥深水区勘探钻井油泄漏的定量风险评估(QRA)

获取原文

摘要

Major offshore accidents such as Macondo well incident highlight one of the possible failure modes and subsequent disasters when an offshore engineering project could go wrong. Such events can potentially happen during any phase of an offshore well's life - starting from the exploratory drilling phase to the final phase of plug and abandonment. Major factors that significantly contribute in defining such accident scenarios are the geological and operational complexities, equipment reliability, human factors, geographical/economy location, and environmental conditions. The path taken by the reservoir fluids to reach the sea floor is also an important factor in determining the worst case discharge rates. It is expected that the environmental risks from an oil/gas spill would also be function of the type of hydrocarbons released and duration of the spill. A representative Neogene well is studied for quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for spill in exploratory phase from the Mississippi Canyon in the Gulf of Mexico with a water depth of 3,000ft and total vertical depth of 16,726 ft and the representative reservoir properties for this area are selected from the literature. Due to the large variation of reservoir properties, lognormal distributions have been assumed for some of the reservoir properties and from the Monte Carlo simulations P10, P50 and P90 values are estimated. Based on P50 and P90 values, the worst case discharge rates are calculated using a commercially available multiphase flow simulator with black oil model. Based on historical trends, release of hydrocarbons during blowouts are simulated for the following circumstances: seabed and topside releases, restricted and unrestricted flow through BOP, flow with drill pipe inside the wellbore and open hole flow without drill pipe and flow from the reservoir when it is either fully or partially penetrated. To incorporate the technological improvements and study their effects on the reduction of the overall risk associated with deepwater drilling activity, two cases are considered and compared to each other. First case is based on the historical data and the second case is a modified version of the first case by incorporating some of the recent technological improvements and newly built oil spill response systems e.g. capping stacks. The historical kick statistics and the equipment reliability data available in the literature is used to analyze various scenarios and corresponding flow rates. Risk is analyzed using the failure probability and consequence analysis and is presented in the form of a risk matrix for the different case studied and for the overall drilling activity as well.
机译:重大的海上事故,例如Macondo井事件,突出了海上工程项目可能出错时可能的故障模式和随后的灾难之一。此类事件有可能在海上钻井寿命的任何阶段发生-从探索性钻探阶段到最终的封堵和废弃阶段。定义此类事故场景的主要因素是地质和操作复杂性,设备可靠性,人为因素,地理/经济位置以及环境条件。在确定最坏情况下的排放速率时,储层流体所采取的到达海床的路径也是一个重要因素。可以预料的是,来自石油/天然气泄漏的环境风险也将取决于所释放的碳氢化合物的类型和泄漏的持续时间。研究了具有代表性的Neogene井,以进行探索性定量风险评估(QRA),用于探索墨西哥湾密西西比峡谷的溢油阶段,水深为3,000ft,总垂直深度为16,726ft,该地区的典型储层特性为从文献中选择。由于储层物性的巨大变化,一些储层物性被假定为对数正态分布,并从蒙特卡洛模拟中估算出P10,P50和P90值。根据P50和P90值,使用带有黑油模型的市售多相流模拟器计算最坏情况下的排放率。根据历史趋势,在以下情况下模拟了井喷过程中碳氢化合物的释放:海床和顶面释放,通过防喷器的受限和无限制流动,井筒内有钻杆的流量以及无钻杆时的裸眼井流量以及当其从储层中流出时被完全或部分穿透。为了纳入技术改进并研究其对降低与深水钻井活动有关的总体风险的影响,我们将两种情况进行了比较。第一种情况是基于历史数据,第二种情况是对第一种情况的修改版本,其中结合了一些最新的技术改进和新建的溢油应急系统,例如封盖堆栈。文献中提供的历史反冲统计数据和设备可靠性数据可用于分析各种情况和相应的流量。使用故障概率和后果分析对风险进行分析,并以风险矩阵的形式表示所研究的不同案例以及整个钻探活动的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号