首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications >Available-Bandwidth-Based Routing in IEEE 802.15.4-Based Ad-Hoc Networks: Proactive vs. Opportunistic Technique
【24h】

Available-Bandwidth-Based Routing in IEEE 802.15.4-Based Ad-Hoc Networks: Proactive vs. Opportunistic Technique

机译:基于IEEE 802.15.4的Ad-Hoc网络中基于可用带宽的路由:主动与机会技术

获取原文

摘要

In this paper, we present an available-bandwidth-based proactive routing protocol for IEEE 802.15.4-based single-sink and multi-sink ad-hoc networks. The available-bandwidth-based proactive routing protocol maintains the best forwarding path in terms of the end-to-end available bandwidth towards each sink node present in a network. Moreover, a node can maintain more than one data forwarding path towards the same sink node. We performed extensive simulations, and compared our proactive routing protocol with a state-of-the-art opportunistic routing protocol. The simulation results demonstrate that the opportunistic routing protocol can distribute data load unevenly (in case of multiple sink nodes), hence results in high end-to-end delay and low Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR). In case of our proactive routing protocol, selecting forwarding paths by only considering the end-to-end available bandwidth invariably results in lengthy data forwarding paths. Lengthy data forwarding paths results in higher intra-flow contention, hence PDR and end-to-end delay are impacted. One of the simulation scenarios, using multiple sink nodes, demonstrates that in case of our proactive routing protocol, carefully selecting the data forwarding path(s) that are not too long compared to the shortest available data forwarding path(s), but have better end-to-end available bandwidth significantly improves the performance of the proactive routing protocol. Therefore, our results hint that, in general, trading off end-to-end available bandwidth and the length of a data forwarding path may improve end-to-end PDR and delay.
机译:在本文中,我们为基于IEEE 802.15.4的单接收器和多接收器自组织网络提供了一种基于可用带宽的主动路由协议。就面向网络中存在的每个宿节点的端到端可用带宽而言,基于可用带宽的主动路由协议可保持最佳转发路径。此外,一个节点可以维持一条通往同一宿节点的数据转发路径。我们进行了广泛的仿真,并将我们的主动式路由协议与最新的机会路由协议进行了比较。仿真结果表明,机会路由协议可以不均匀地分布数据负载(在多个宿节点的情况下),从而导致高的端到端延迟和低的数据包传输率(PDR)。在我们的主动路由协议的情况下,仅通过考虑端到端可用带宽来选择转发路径必然会导致数据转发路径过长。较长的数据转发路径会导致较高的流内争用,因此会影响PDR和端到端延迟。一种使用多个接收器节点的模拟场景演示了在我们的主动路由协议的情况下,仔细选择与最短的可用数据转发路径相比不太长的数据转发路径端到端可用带宽显着提高了主动路由协议的性能。因此,我们的结果表明,一般而言,在端到端可用带宽和数据转发路径的长度之间进行权衡可能会改善端到端PDR和延迟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号