首页> 外文会议>International conference on solid waste technology and management >Comparison of the Landfill Disposal Options for Bottom and Fly Ash Fractions from an Industrial-Scale (120 MW) Power Plant Incinerating Different Fuel Mixtures
【24h】

Comparison of the Landfill Disposal Options for Bottom and Fly Ash Fractions from an Industrial-Scale (120 MW) Power Plant Incinerating Different Fuel Mixtures

机译:工业规模(120 MW)焚化不同燃料混合物的电厂底部和粉煤灰部分的垃圾掩埋处置方案比较

获取原文

摘要

In this study, we determined the leachable concentrations of As, Ba, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg,Ni, Pb, Mo, Sb, Se, Zn, chloride, fluoride, sulphate and DOC in two types of bottom ash and flyash fractions [(BA(1) and FA(1); Fuels: 50% peat, 25% coal, 25% wood residues) and (BA(2)and FA(2); Fuels: 50% peat, 50% forest residues)] from a large-sized (120 MW) bubblingfluidized bed boiler. The bottom ash BA(1) and bottom ash BA(2) can be disposed of in an inertwaste landfill. However, in the fly ash FA(1), the leachable concentration of Mo (3.9 mg kg~(-1);d.w) and Se (0.17 mg kg~(-1); d.w.) exceeded the limit values for the acceptance of waste at inertwaste landfill. Therefore, this residue may be disposed in a non-hazardous waste landfill. In thefly ash FA(2), the leachable concentration of Mo (3.2 mg kg~(-1); d.w.) exceeded the limit valuesfor the acceptance of waste at an inert waste landfill. Therefore, this residue may be disposed innon-hazardous waste landfill. In this context it is worth noting that, although the leachedconcentrations of Mo and Se exceeded the limit values for an inert waste landfill, according tothe Finnish legislation, which is based on EU directives and regulations, the competentenvironmental authority may decide that the maximum limit values can be up to three timeshigher on the basis of the local environmental conditions in a landfill. In spite of this possibilityfor the environmental authorities to relax the minimum limit values for Mo and Se, the fly ashfraction FA(1) and fly ash fraction FA(2) investigated in this study cannot be deposited in inertwaste landfill according to local policy decisions with respect to relaxation. It is worth notingthat in this study we have only determined whether the bottom ash fractions BA(1) and BA(2), aswell as fly ash fractions FA(1) and FA(2) may be disposed of either to an inert waste, a nonhazardouswaste or a hazardous waste landfill site. We could like to point out that according tothe Finnish legislation the utilizations of these residues are still possible. However, then anenvironmental permit is required.
机译:在这项研究中,我们确定了砷,钡,镉,铬,铜,汞的可浸出浓度, 两种底灰和粉煤灰中的Ni,Pb,Mo,Sb,Se,Zn,氯化物,氟化物,硫酸盐和DOC 灰分[(BA(1)和FA(1);燃料:泥炭50%,煤25%,木材残渣25%)和(BA(2) 和FA(2);燃料:50%的泥炭,50%的森林残留物]] 流化床锅炉。底灰BA(1)和底灰BA(2)可以在惰性气体中处理 垃圾掩埋场。然而,在粉煤灰FA(1)中,Mo的可浸出浓度为3.9 mg kg〜(-1)。 d.w)和Se(0.17 mg kg〜(-1); d.w.)超过了惰性废物接收的极限值 垃圾掩埋场。因此,这些残留物可以被处置在无害的垃圾掩埋场中。在里面 粉煤灰FA(2)中Mo的可浸出浓度(3.2 mg kg〜(-1); d.w.)超过了限值 用于在惰性废物填埋场接受废物。因此,此残留物可能会被丢弃在 非危险废物填埋场。在这种情况下,值得注意的是,尽管浸出 据Mo称,Mo和Se的浓度超过了惰性垃圾填埋场的极限值。 基于欧盟指令和法规的芬兰法律, 环境主管部门可以决定最大极限值可以是最大极限值的三倍 根据垃圾填埋场的当地环境条件更高。尽管有这种可能性 让环保部门放宽对粉煤灰中Mo和Se的最低限值 本研究中研究的FA(1)和粉煤灰FA(2)不能以惰性形式沉积 根据当地有关放松政策的决定,将垃圾填埋场。值得注意的是 在这项研究中,我们仅确定了底灰分BA(1)和BA(2)是否为 粉煤灰馏分FA(1)和FA(2)可以处置为惰性废物,无害物质 废物或危险废物掩埋场。我们想指出的是,根据 芬兰立法仍然可以利用这些残留物。但是,然后 需要环境许可证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号