首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the International Society of Exposure Science >Social Cost Benefit Analysis of Water and Sanitation Improvement in a Poor Urban Slum
【24h】

Social Cost Benefit Analysis of Water and Sanitation Improvement in a Poor Urban Slum

机译:贫民窟改善供水和卫生的社会成本效益分析

获取原文

摘要

Background: Lack of access to safe water supply and adequate sanitation services is a major cause of diarrhea in poor urban slums, directly affecting to the livelihoods and incomes of the poor residents by impacting their health and ability to earn. Aims: This paper compares the economic feasibility of implementing interventions to improve water quality at the point of use in a poor urban slum, where the prevalence of water-related diarrhea was estimated at 33% and where increased morbidity and premature mortality impose a socio-economic burden on the local population of 3.4 to 17.1% of area annual income. Methods: Five household intervention alternatives were identified for water quality improvement in a poor urban slum, including replacing deteriorated attic water tanks with rooftop tanks, replacing water piping, replacing wastewater piping, and a combination of these interventions. A social cost-benefit assessment (SCBA) was conducted to evaluate and compare these alternatives under 6 scenarios that combine the ranges of minimum to maximum costs with those of minimum to maximum benefits. The costs were based on capital and operational expenditures while the benefits considered averted morbidity and premature mortality, using various economic tools including the Cost of Illness, the Averted Behavior, and the Disability Adjusted Life Years approaches for morbidity valuation, and the Human Capital Approach for mortality valuation. The applied SCBA methods included the Benefit/ Cost ratio, the Net Present Value, and the Return on Investment. Results: The SCBA revealed that installing rooftop tanks and replacing water piping at the household were the most economically viable interventions, with a Benefit/Cost ratio ranging between 4.6 and 16.8 USD for every 1 USD invested. These alternatives also exhibited a positive return on investment within a maximum of 10 years from implementation. Thus, simple low cost interventions are expected to result in positive health impacts which translate into a significant positive socio-economic impact in a poor urban slum.
机译:背景:无法获得安全的供水和适当的卫生服务是贫穷的城市贫民窟中腹泻的主要原因,它通过影响穷人的健康和收入能力而直接影响他们的生计和收入。目的:本文比较了在贫困的城市贫民窟使用干预措施以改善水质的经济可行性,因为该地区贫民窟的水相关性腹泻患病率估计为33%,而发病率和过早死亡的增加给社会带来了危害。当地人口的经济负担占该地区年收入的3.4%至17.1%。方法:确定了五种家庭干预措施,以改善贫困城市贫民窟的水质,包括用屋顶水箱替换退化的阁楼水箱,替换水管,替换废水管,以及这些干预的组合。进行了社会成本效益评估(SCBA),以评估和比较6种方案下的这些替代方案,这些方案将最小至最大成本的范围与最小至最大收益的范围相结合。成本基于资本和运营支出,而收益则考虑到避免了发病率和过早死亡,并使用各种经济工具,包括疾病成本,避免的行为和残疾调整生命年方法对发病率进行评估,而人力资本方法用于对疾病进行评估。死亡率评估。应用的SCBA方法包括收益/成本比,净现值和投资回报率。结果:SCBA透露,在家庭中安装屋顶水箱和更换水管是最经济可行的干预措施,每投入1美元,收益/成本之比在4.6和16.8美元之间。自实施以来,这些替代方案在最长10年内也显示出正的投资回报。因此,简单的低成本干预措施有望对健康产生积极影响,在贫困的城市贫民窟中转化为重大的积极社会经济影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号