首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the International Society of Exposure Science >Air pollution, health, and environmental justice implications of shifting transportation fuels
【24h】

Air pollution, health, and environmental justice implications of shifting transportation fuels

机译:转移运输燃料对空气污染,健康和环境正义的影响

获取原文

摘要

Background: Vehicles are a major contributor to air pollution health effects in the United States and globally. Air pollution exposures in the U.S. are generally higher for low-socioeconomic status (SES) than for high-SES individuals.Aims: To understand health and environmental justice aspects of alternative transportation fuels. Methods: We develop and apply a spatially and temporally explicit life cycle inventory to estimate emission changes per technology. We then use a national dispersion model (WRF/Chem; 12-km scale) to estimate impacts to ambient concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ozone (03). We separately estimate air pollution health impacts for white, nonwhite, high-income, and low-income individuals, for a 10% increase in vehicle-miles traveled via conventional fuel (gasoline) versus alternatives: grid-independent gasoline-electric hybrid cars, diesel cars, compressed natural gas (CNG) cars, cars fueled by ethanol from corn grain or corn stover, or battery electric vehicles powered by electricity from various fossil or non-fossil sources.Results: For scenarios with predominantly tailpipe emissions (gasoline hybrid-electric, diesel, CNG), total health impacts are reduced, but demographic aspects of exposures are unchanged (low-SES have higher exposures), relative to gasoline. For scenarios with emissions shifted up the supply chain (e.g., ethanol; vehicle electrification), health impacts are often similar to gasoline (or slightly worse), but with a demographic shift of decreasing relative impacts to low-SES individuals (i.e., helping address environmental injustice). Our research highlights the importance of considering total impacts and also distributional aspects of those impacts.Conclusions: Some of the technologies explored here would reduce total health impacts while maintaining current demographic disparities; others offer similar or slightly worse total health impacts but with reduced demographic disparities.
机译:背景:在美国和全球范围内,车辆是造成空气污染健康影响的主要因素。在美国,低社会经济地位(SES)的空气污染暴露通常比高社会经济地位的人更高。目的:了解替代运输燃料对健康和环境正义的影响。方法:我们开发并应用时空明确的生命周期清单,以估算每种技术的排放变化。然后,我们使用国家分散模型(WRF / Chem; 12公里比例)来估计对细颗粒物(PM2.5)和臭氧(03)的环境浓度的影响。我们分别估算了白人,非白人,高收入和低收入人群对空气污染健康的影响,通过传统燃料(汽油)行驶的里程数比其他方式(不依赖电网的汽油-电动混合动力汽车,柴油汽车,压缩天然气(CNG)汽车,以玉米籽粒或玉米秸秆的乙醇为燃料的汽车,或由来自各种化石或非化石能源的电力驱动的电池电动汽车。电力,柴油,CNG)对健康的总体影响有所降低,但相对于汽油而言,暴露的人口统计学方面没有变化(低SES的暴露量较高)。对于排放在供应链上转移的情况(例如,乙醇;汽车电气化),健康影响通常与汽油相似(或稍差一些),但人口统计学上的变化是对低SES个体的相对影响减少(即,帮助解决环境不公)。我们的研究突出了考虑总影响以及这些影响的分布方面的重要性。结论:本文探讨的某些技术将减少总健康影响,同时保持当前的人口差异。其他人对健康的总体影响相似或稍差,但人口差异却有所减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号