首页> 外文会议>Wireless and Optical Communication Conference >Quantifying performance of duplexing, multiplexing and multiple access in mesh, relay, and ad-hoc networks
【24h】

Quantifying performance of duplexing, multiplexing and multiple access in mesh, relay, and ad-hoc networks

机译:量化网状网络,中继网络和自组织网络中双工,多路复用和多路访问的性能

获取原文

摘要

Decentralized wireless ad hoc networks have become attractive in several settings. The choice of duplexing, multiplexing, and multiple access (D/M/MA) techniques in ad hoc networks is critical to important network characteristics. Yet determining the “optimum” D/M/MA technique is still an open problem, and to our knowledge very few works directly compare available D/M/MA techniques. In this paper we extend previous comparisons of mesh and relay networks to include a simple ad hoc network. In addition, in contrast to our previous work that uses an equal peak power constraint, here we apply two different constraints: an equal average power, and an equal energy constraint. Our comparison method is illustrated with the mesh network, and results for relay networks are summarized. We then investigate D/M/MA performance for an example ad hoc network. We show that one's conclusions regarding the different D/M/MA schemes depend upon the comparison constraint, but for all three constraints, results illustrate that specific types of hybrid time-frequency resource allocation schemes are equivalent to or better than pure time division or pure frequency division in terms of data rate, signal-to-noise ratio, and throughput, in all network topologies. Moreover, the hybrid time-frequency schemes offer more flexibility than the pure time and frequency division schemes in terms of bit-error-ratio and range.
机译:分散式无线自组织网络在多种环境下变得有吸引力。自组织网络中双工,多路复用和多址(D / M / MA)技术的选择对于重要的网络特性至关重要。然而,确定“最佳” D / M / MA技术仍然是一个悬而未决的问题,据我们所知,很少有作品可以直接比较可用的D / M / MA技术。在本文中,我们将网状网络和中继网络的先前比较扩展到一个简单的ad hoc网络。另外,与我们以前使用相等的峰值功率约束的工作相反,这里我们应用两个不同的约束:相等的平均功率和相等的能量约束。用网状网络说明了我们的比较方法,并总结了中继网络的结果。然后,我们研究一个示例性ad网络的D / M / MA性能。我们表明,关于不同D / M / MA方案的结论取决于比较约束,但是对于所有三个约束,结果都表明特定类型的混合时频资源分配方案等效于或优于纯时分或纯所有网络拓扑中的数据速率,信噪比和吞吐量方面的频分。此外,就比特误码率和范围而言,混合时频方案比纯时分频方案具有更大的灵活性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号