首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Pattern Recognition >Assessing Textural Features for Writer Identification on Different Writing Styles and Forgeries
【24h】

Assessing Textural Features for Writer Identification on Different Writing Styles and Forgeries

机译:评估不同写作风格和锻造作者识别的教学特征

获取原文

摘要

In this study we assess the performance of textural descriptors for writer identification on different writing styles and also on forgeries. To do that, we have performed a series of experiments using the Fire maker database, which provides for the same writer texts written on three different writing styles and also copied forged text. Our experimental protocol is based on the dissimilarity framework and SVM classifiers, which were trained with LBP (Local Binary Pattern) and LPQ (Local Phase Quantization). The 250 writers of the database were divided into different configurations to observe the impacts of different sizes of the training set on the performance of the system. Our experimental results corroborates the fact that the texture is an interesting alternative for writer identification. The classifier trained with LPQ was able to produce error rates 23 percentage points smaller than those reported in the literature for upper-case and free writing styles. Regarding the forgeries, the LPQ-based classifier goes further reducing the error rate up to 44 percentage points depending on the writing style used for training.
机译:在这项研究中,我们评估了对不同写作风格的作者识别的教学描述符的表现,也是在伪造者上。为此,我们已经使用了火灾制造商数据库进行了一系列实验,该实验为三种不同的写作方式编写的同一作者文本,也可以复制伪造的文本。我们的实验方案基于不相似框架和SVM分类器,其被LBP(局部二进制模式)和LPQ(局部相位量化)培训。数据库的250个作家分为不同的配置,以观察不同大小的培训对系统性能的影响。我们的实验结果证实了纹理是作者识别的有趣替代品的事实。使用LPQ培训的分类器能够产生比大写和自由写入样式的文献中报告的错误率为23个百分点。关于备注,基于LPQ的分类器进一步将最高可达44个百分点的错误率降低到培训的写入风格。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号