首页> 外文会议>International conference on space operations >Mission Design from Cradle to Grave: Applying Concurrent Engineering from Mission Feasibility Analysis through to End of Life Operations
【24h】

Mission Design from Cradle to Grave: Applying Concurrent Engineering from Mission Feasibility Analysis through to End of Life Operations

机译:从摇篮到坟墓的使命设计:将同时工程从使命可行性分析应用到终身操作结束

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Concurrent Engineering is a specialised work methodology based on the parallelization of tasks. The complete design team, composed of the various technical domain specialists, work on the different aspects of the project at the beginning of the design process. The methodology relies on identifying and parameterising dependencies between team members. Rapid gain of design consistency and overall project convergence is obtained with constant direct communication and data interchange. Results are achieved in a dramatically shorter time compared with a classical design approaches. This technique has been put to very good effect in Europe to assess the technical and financial feasibility of future space missions and new spacecraft concepts, space system trade-offs and options evaluation, new technology validation at system & mission level, requirements definition and consolidation. For example, the ESA Concurrent Design Facility (CDF) is routinely used for Phase 0 (pre-phase A studies); Large system integrators (LSI) also have established similar infrastructure for their own mission engineering tasks. Concurrent Design may be conducted as a manual process, which can be aided by the use of simple tools and techniques such linked spreadsheets. But it is most effective and efficient when supported by modern tools, such as J-CDS Concurrent Design Platform (CDP) and ESA's Open Concurrent Design Server (OCDS, under development), which not only support the process but are increasingly integrated with other external tools such as simulation frameworks, requirements management tools, and other system modelling environments. At this point, the artefacts of a concurrent design session become a design model; a set of integrated data products which can be reused in later phases of the project. These artefacts will eventually specify or influence the design of the mission components, spacecraft, payload and ground segment, which traditionally follow parallel (but independent) traditional development lifecycles. Concurrent design sessions at facilities such as CDF feature the strong interactions of a physically collocated team. The ESA CDF organises the studies in bi-weekly half day sessions with the participation of all disciplines needed. For a typical ESA study the ESA CDF holds between 6 to 10 sessions (i.e. 3 to 6 weeks). This paper explores the potential use of Concurrent Engineering techniques and tools throughout the whole lifecycle, supporting physically distributed teams. Phase 0 to B could effectively be classed as a single "design phase", which continues from initial concept to the finished design using the same specialists, tools and communication techniques. There is still a need for reviews and acceptance at different phases of the design which can be achieved by taking "snapshots" of the ongoing process and measuring the maturity of the desired products/The concurrent design tools are increasingly connected with system models for supporting the satellite, payload and simulator designs, which themselves manifest themselves in the operational data products, such as TM/TC database, operational procedures, operational simulators, used for system validation and operator training prior to launch and maintained throughout the operational lifetime. This natural flow of information has been recognised in literature such as ECSS-E-TM-10-20A: Space Engineering Product Data Exchange. Using a consistent methodology (concurrent engineering) and toolset from the cradle (mission concept) to grave (end of life of operations) will liberate the natural benefits of the methodology (agility, reduced timescale, increased communications, flexibility ) compared with traditional rigid approaches and allow a complete, traceable, auditable flow of mission design information. What's more, it presents an opportunity for operational aspects to have greater influence on the mission design than might currently be the case. The paper will describe how this vision
机译:并行工程是一个基于任务的并行化的专门的工作方法。完整的设计团队,在各个技术领域专家组成,对工作在设计过程的开始,项目的不同方面。该方法依赖于识别和参数化的团队成员之间的依赖关系。设计一致性和整体项目的衔接快速增益与恒定直流通信和数据交换获得。结果在大大缩短的时间与经典的设计方法相比实现。这种技术已经投入到很好的效果在欧洲以评估系统和使命的水平,需求定义和整合未来的太空任务,新的航天器概念,空间系统的权衡和选择评估,新技术验证的技术和财务可行性。例如,ESA同步设计设施(CDF)被常规地用于阶段0(相位预-A研究);大型系统集成(LSI)也建立了类似的基础设施为自己的使命工程任务。并行设计可以作为手动过程,这可以通过使用简单的工具和技术,例如电子表格链接来辅助进行。但是,当现代工具,如J-CDS并行设计平台(CDP)和欧洲航天局的开放式并行设计Server支持(OCDS,正在开发),它不仅支持这一进程,但与其他外部都越来越融入这是最有效的工具,如仿真框架,需求管理工具和其它系统建模环境。在这一点上,并行设计会话的文物成为一个设计模型;一组可在项目的后期阶段中重复使用数据集成产品。这些文物最终将指定或影响任务组件,航天器,有效载荷和地面段的设计,通常追随平行(但是独立的)传统的开发生命周期。并行设计会议在设施,如CDF配备了物理上并队的强相互作用。欧空局CDF组织与所需的所有学科的参与双周半天的会议研究。对于一个典型的ESA研究的ESA CDF 6至10次(即3至6周)之间成立。本文探讨了整个全生命周期中的潜在应用的并行工程技术和工具,支持物理上分散的团队。相位0至B可以有效地被归类为一个单一的“设计相位”,其使用相同的专家,工具和通信技术从初始概念到成品设计延续。还有一个需要在其可以通过采取持续的过程的“快照”和测量所需产品的成熟度达到了设计的不同阶段审查和验收/并行设计的工具越来越多地与系统模型连接,用于支撑卫星,有效载荷和模拟器的设计,其本身表现在所述运行数据的产品,如TM / TC数据库,运行程序,操作模拟器,用于系统验证和之前发射并在整个工作寿命维持操作者培训。这种信息的自然流动在文献中被确认,如ECSS-E-TM-10-20A:航天工程产品数据交换。使用一致的方法(并行工程)和工具从摇篮(任务概念)到坟墓(操作寿命终结)将释放方法论(敏捷性,降低时间尺度,提高通信的灵活性)的天然优点与传统的刚性方法相比,并让一个完整的,可追溯的,可审计的任务设计信息流。更重要的是,它提供了一个机会,操作方面对任务设计,比目前可能的情况下更大的影响。本文将介绍如何愿景

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号