首页> 外文会议>International pipeline conference >A NOVEL APPROACH TO EVALUATING LEAK DETECTION CPM SYSTEM SENSITIVITY/RELIABILITY PERFORMANCE TRADE-OFFS
【24h】

A NOVEL APPROACH TO EVALUATING LEAK DETECTION CPM SYSTEM SENSITIVITY/RELIABILITY PERFORMANCE TRADE-OFFS

机译:评价泄漏检测CPM系统灵敏度/可靠性性能折衷方案的新方法

获取原文

摘要

As defined in American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice 1130 (API RP 1130), CPM system leak detection performance is evaluated on the basis of four distinct but interrelated metrics: sensitivity, reliability, accuracy and robustness. These performance metrics are captured to evaluate performance, manage risk and prioritize mitigation efforts. Evaluating and quantifying sensitivity performance of a CPM system is paramount to ensure the performance of the CPM system is acceptable based on a company's risk profile for detecting leaks. Employing API RP 1130 recommended testing methodologies including parameter manipulation techniques, software simulated leak tests and/or removal of test quantities of commodity from the pipeline are excellent approaches to understanding the leak sensitivity metric. Good reliability (false alarm) performance is critical to ensure that control center operator desensitization does not occur through long term exposure to false alarms. Continuous tracking and analyzing of root causes of leak alarms ensures that the effects of seasonal variations or changes to operation on CPM system performance are managed appropriately. The complexity of quantifying this metric includes qualitatively evaluating the relevance of false alarms. The interrelated nature of the above performance metrics imposes conflicting requirements and results in inherent trade-offs. Optimizing the trade-off between reliability and sensitivity involves identifying the point that thresholds must be set to obtain a balance of a desired sensitivity and false alarm rate. This paper presents an approach to illustrate the combined sensitivity/reliability performance for an example pipeline. The paper discusses considerations addressed while determining the methodology such as stakeholder input, ongoing CPM system enhancements, sensitivity/reliability trade-off, risk based capital investment and graphing techniques. The paper also elaborates on a number of identified benefits of the selected overall methodology.
机译:根据美国石油协会推荐的惯例1130(API RP 1130)中的定义,CPM系统泄漏检测性能是基于四个不同但相互关联的指标进行评估的:灵敏度,可靠性,准确性和鲁棒性。捕获这些性能指标可评估性能,管理风险并确定缓解措施的优先级。评估和量化CPM系统的灵敏度性能至关重要,以确保基于公司用于检测泄漏的风险状况,CPM系统的性能可以接受。采用API RP 1130推荐的测试方法,包括参数操纵技术,软件模拟的泄漏测试和/或从管道中去除商品的测试量,是理解泄漏敏感度指标的绝佳方法。良好的可靠性(错误警报)性能对于确保控制中心操作员不会因长期暴露于错误警报而降低灵敏度至关重要。持续跟踪和分析泄漏警报的根本原因可确保适当管理季节性变化或操作变化对CPM系统性能的影响。量化此指标的复杂性包括定性评估错误警报的相关性。上述性能指标的相互关联的性质强加了相互矛盾的要求,并导致了固有的权衡。优化可靠性和灵敏度之间的权衡涉及确定必须设置阈值才能获得所需灵敏度和错误警报率之间的平衡的点。本文提出了一种方法来说明示例管道的组合灵敏度/可靠性性能。本文讨论了在确定方法论时要解决的注意事项,例如利益相关者的意见,CPM系统的不断改进,敏感性/可靠性的权衡,基于风险的资本投资和绘图技术。本文还详细介绍了所选总体方法的许多已确定的好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号