首页> 外文会议>IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science >Understanding Incentives: Mechanism Design Becomes Algorithm Design
【24h】

Understanding Incentives: Mechanism Design Becomes Algorithm Design

机译:理解激励:机制设计成为算法设计

获取原文

摘要

We provide a computationally efficient black-box reduction from mechanism design to algorithm design in very general settings. Specifically, we give an approximation-preserving reduction from truthfully maximizing any objective under arbitrary feasibility constraints with arbitrary bidder types to (not necessarily truthfully) maximizing the same objective plus virtual welfare (under the same feasibility constraints). Our reduction is based on a fundamentally new approach: we describe a mechanism's behavior indirectly only in terms of the expected value it awards bidders for certain behavior, and never directly access the allocation rule at all. Applying our new approach to revenue, we exhibit settings where our reduction holds both ways. That is, we also provide an approximation-sensitive reduction from (non-truthfully) maximizing virtual welfare to (truthfully) maximizing revenue, and therefore the two problems are computationally equivalent. With this equivalence in hand, we show that both problems are NP-hard to approximate within any polynomial factor, even for a single monotone sub modular bidder. We further demonstrate the applicability of our reduction by providing a truthful mechanism maximizing fractional max-min fairness.
机译:在非常普通的设置中,我们提供了从机制设计到算法设计的高效计算黑盒缩减。具体来说,我们给出了一个近似保留的减少量,从在具有任意投标者类型的任意可行性约束下真实地最大化任何目标到(在相同的可行性约束下)真实地最大化相同目标加虚拟福利的(不一定是真实地)最大化。我们的减少是基于一种全新的方法:我们仅根据机制为某些行为授予竞标者的期望值来间接描述机制的行为,而根本不会直接访问分配规则。将我们的新方法应用于收入,我们展示了两种情况都可以减少的设置。也就是说,我们还提供了从(非真实)最大化虚拟福利到(真实)最大化收入的近似敏感减少,因此,这两个问题在计算上是等效的。有了这种等效性,我们证明,即使对于单个单调子模块投标人,这两个问题都很难在任何多项式因子内逼近NP。我们通过提供使分数最大-最小公平性最大化的真实机制,进一步证明了减少的适用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号