首页> 外文会议>International congress on exposition noise control engineering >Can noise from a main road be more annoying than from a highway? An environmental health and soundscape approach
【24h】

Can noise from a main road be more annoying than from a highway? An environmental health and soundscape approach

机译:主干道的噪音会比高速公路干吗?环境健康和声音景观方法

获取原文

摘要

Background: In an early TNO-report (Miedema 1993) different exposure response curves were reported for highways and other road traffic. Other road traffic noise exposure showed less annoyance than noise from highways - but higher than railway noise exposure. In the later exposure response curves associated with the EU noise directive no separate account is made for other road traffic. Methods: Intensive traffic modeling, noise and survey information from two large studies in alpine valleys was used to generate enhanced exposure response curves. Further analyses were carried out by means of multiple logistic regression to explore the importance of modifying factors. Results: We found no uniform exposure response curves in the two valleys. Most important modifying factors were the relative position of the main road to the valley topography, settlement patterns, indicators of fluctuation/emergence, the number of heavy trucks and combined exposure (vibration, air). Conclusion: In complex situations (alpine topography, open settlement patterns, high signal to noise ratio) the accumulation of factors can in some cases lead to higher annoyance from main roads than from highways in a univariate perspective. Applying standard curves for Environmental health impact assessments may lead to misleading results. More inclusive approaches (soundscape, environmental health) are needed.
机译:背景:在早期的TNO报告(Miedema,1993年)中,报告了高速公路和其他道路交通的不同暴露响应曲线。其他公路交通噪声暴露的烦恼程度比公路噪声小,但高于铁路噪声暴露程度。在后面的与EU噪声指令相关的暴露响应曲线中,没有单独说明其他道路交通。方法:使用高密度交通模型,噪声和来自高寒谷地两项大型研究的调查信息来生成增强的暴露响应曲线。通过多元逻辑回归进行了进一步的分析,以探讨修改因子的重要性。结果:我们在两个谷地中均未发现均匀的暴露响应曲线。最重要的修改因素是通往山谷地形的主要道路的相对位置,沉降方式,起伏/涌现的指标,重型卡车的数量和综合暴露(振动,空气)。结论:在复杂情况下(高山地形,开放的沉降模式,高信噪比),从单变量的角度来看,在某些情况下,因素的累积可能导致主要公路的烦恼比高速公路的烦恼更大。将标准曲线应用于环境健康影响评估可能会导致误导性结果。需要采取更具包容性的方法(景观,环境健康)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号