首页> 外文会议>ASME international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering >ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANT WAVE HEIGHT - PEAK PERIOD DISTRIBUTION CONSIDERING THE WAVE STEEPNESS LIMIT
【24h】

ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANT WAVE HEIGHT - PEAK PERIOD DISTRIBUTION CONSIDERING THE WAVE STEEPNESS LIMIT

机译:重大波高的评估-考虑波硬度极限的峰值周期分布

获取原文

摘要

The physical limit of the significant wave steepness is generally exceeded when assessing the seastate climate and the extreme iso-probability contours, i.e. too short significant wave peak periods T_p are sometimes associated to a certain significant wave height Hs. The occurrence of not physically consistent T_p is clearly due to a fault in the generally made assumption of a log-normal distribution of the T_p , where the physical limit for the period would be T_p > 0, i.e. the existence limit of the log-normal distribution, which is well below the real physical limit for significant wave steepness. If this is not a problem for pipeline design, where stability and fatigue are dominated by longer peak periods associated at each significant wave height, loads overestimation could arise for near surface structures, e.g. riser, where the largest loads and fatigue, are caused by the shorter peak periods associated to a certain significant wave height. Hence, the possibility to define a T_p distribution which respects the physical lower bound of the limiting wave steepness has a significant relevance when dealing with design and installation of near surface structures. The present paper proposes a new methodology for the assessment of the Hs-T_p distribution which respects an a-priori defined wave steepness limit. This can be done basing on the definition of significant wave steepness S_p =2πH_s/gT_p~2which, assessing a limiting steepness S_p , provide an physical lower bound T_p_(lim)for the peak period. Defining a new variable T_p = T_p - T_(plim) and imposing that T_p ' follows a log-normal distribution, hence having a physical limit T_p ' > 0, is equivalent to assess a T_p distribution which respects the defined significant wave steepness limit T_p > T_(plim) A test case compares results obtained with the 'old' and 'new' methodologies and shows the implication on the design loads. Moreover, another test case has been investigated to verify the performance and characteristics of the new methodology.
机译:当评估海面气候和极端等概率等高线时,通常会超过有效波陡度的物理极限,即,过短的有效波峰周期T_p有时会与某个有效波高Hs相关。物理上不一致的T_p的出现显然是由于通常假设的T_p对数正态分布的一个错误所致,其中该周期的物理极限为T_p> 0,即对数正态的存在极限分布,远低于明显的波陡度的实际物理极限。如果这不是管道设计的问题,因为在每个显着的波高处,稳定性和疲劳度都由较长的峰值周期决定,那么对于近地表结构(例如墙体)可能会产生高估载荷的情况。最大载荷和疲劳的上升管是由与一定的重要波高相关的较短的峰值周期引起的。因此,在处理近表面结构的设计和安装时,定义一个符合极限波陡度的物理下限的T_p分布的可能性具有重大意义。本文提出了一种评估Hs-T_p分布的新方法,该方法遵循先验定义的波陡度极限。这可以根据有效波陡度S_p =2πH_s/ gT_p〜2的定义来完成,该定义通过评估极限陡度S_p为峰值时段提供物理下界T_p_(lim)。定义新变量T_p = T_p-T_(plim)并强加T_p'遵循对数正态分布,因此具有物理极限T_p'> 0,等效于评估T_p分布,该分布尊重定义的有效波陡度极限T_p > T_(plim)一个测试用例将使用“旧”和“新”方法获得的结果进行比较,并显示对设计负载的影响。此外,还研究了另一个测试用例,以验证新方法的性能和特性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号