首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society >“Black Box Justice”: Robot Judges and AI-based Judgment Processes in China’s Court System
【24h】

“Black Box Justice”: Robot Judges and AI-based Judgment Processes in China’s Court System

机译:“黑匣子正义”:中国法院制度的机器人法官和基于AI的判断过程

获取原文

摘要

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been widely adopted in China’s court system to improve work efficiency to better serve the public. This paper evaluates the three stages of how AI is transforming China’s court system: from being a simple auxiliary tool, performing basic tasks through reconciliation of case and trial information; to assisting judges in decision-making by providing recommendations via the AI’s ability to learn from past precedent and standardized evidence review; and finally, to developing into autonomous agents able to take charge of the court and make judgments as robot judges. However, public skepticism around the credibility of the so-called “black box” of AI algorithms in ensuring fair judgment and achieving justice is escalating, with the concern that efficiency does not guarantee effectiveness or ensure public interest. This paper aims to analyze “black box” issues in each stage and demonstrates why China’s effort to pursue AI as an innovative technical practice to realize judicial fairness should take complex social and ethical contexts into consideration. In order to serve for public good in China’s court system, the new technology must ensure its representation of human values and include public participation.
机译:人工智能(AI)已广泛采用中国法院制度,以提高工作效率,以更好地为公众服务。本文评估了AI如何转变中国法院系统的三个阶段:从作为一个简单的辅助工具,通过案例和试验信息的和解执行基本任务;通过通过AI从过去先例和标准化证据审查的能力提供建议,协助决策法官;最后,发展成为能够负责法院的自治工人,并将判断作为机器人法官。然而,在确保公平判断和实现正义的可信“黑匣子”围绕着可信“黑匣子”的信誉迅速升级,效率不保证有效性或确保公共利益的担忧。本文旨在分析每个阶段的“黑匣子”问题,并展示为什么中国努力追求AI作为实现司法公平的创新技术实践,应考虑复杂的社会和道德环境。为了为中国法院制度提供公益,新技术必须确保其对人类价值观的代表性,包括公众参与。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号