首页> 外文会议>International conference on fluidization >FLUIDIZED BED CALCIUM LOOPING CYCLES FOR CO_2 CAPTURE: A COMPARISON BETWEEN DOLOMITE AND LIMESTONE
【24h】

FLUIDIZED BED CALCIUM LOOPING CYCLES FOR CO_2 CAPTURE: A COMPARISON BETWEEN DOLOMITE AND LIMESTONE

机译:流化床CO_2捕集钙的循环:白云石与石灰石的比较

获取原文

摘要

CO_2 capture and attrition behavior of a dolomite were studied during calcium looping cycles in a lab-scale fluidized bed. Results were compared to those obtained with six limestones in similar tests. The experiments were carried out under conditions representative of a process with calcination in an oxy-firing environment (T = 940°C, CO_2 = 70%_(v/v)), with or without the presence of SO_2. Results showed that the CO_2 capture capacity of the dolomite was larger than that of the limestones, in spite of the lower calcium content of the sorbent. The presence of SO_2 depressed the sorbent CO_2 capture capacity. Contrary to the limestones, the dolomite was subject to extensive attrition and fragmentation.
机译:在实验室规模的流化床中,在钙循环过程中研究了白云石的CO_2捕获和磨损行为。在类似的测试中,将结果与使用六种石灰石获得的结果进行了比较。在代表有氧燃烧环境(T = 940°C,CO_2 = 70%_(v / v))的煅烧过程的条件下进行实验,无论是否存在SO_2。结果表明,尽管吸附剂中的钙含量较低,但白云石的CO_2捕集能力却比石灰石大。 SO_2的存在降低了吸附剂对CO_2的捕获能力。与石灰石相反,白云石遭受了广泛的磨损和破碎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号