首页> 外文会议>Transportation Research Board Annual meeting >Do people use the shortest path? An empirical test of Wardrop's first principle.
【24h】

Do people use the shortest path? An empirical test of Wardrop's first principle.

机译:人们会使用最短的路径吗?对Wardrop第一原理的实证检验。

获取原文

摘要

Most recent route choice models, following either the random utility maximizationor rule-based paradigm, require explicit enumeration of feasible routes. The quality ofmodel estimation and prediction is sensitive to the appropriateness of the considerationset. However, few empirical studies of revealed route characteristics have been reportedin the literature. This study evaluates widely applied shortest path assumption byevaluating morning commute routes followed by residents of the Minneapolis - St. Paulmetropolitan area. Accurate GPS and GIS data were employed to reveal routes peopleused over an eight to thirteen week period. Most people do not choose the shortestpath. Using three weeks of that data, we nd that current route choice set generationalgorithms do not reveal the majority of paths that individuals took. Findings from thisstudy may provide guidance for future eorts in building better route choice models.
机译:遵循随机效用最大化的最新路线选择模型 或基于规则的范式,要求对可行路线进行显式枚举。质量 模型估计和预测对考虑的适当性敏感 放。但是,很少有关于揭示的路线特征的实证研究的报道。 在文学中。本研究通过以下方法评估了广泛应用的最短路径假设: 评估早晨的通勤路线,随后是明尼阿波利斯的居民-圣保罗 大都市区。精确的GPS和GIS数据被用来揭示人们的路线 用了八到十三周的时间。大多数人不选择最短的 小路。使用三周的数据,我们可以得出当前路线选择集的生成 算法不能揭示个人采取的大多数途径。从这个发现 这项研究可能为将来建立更好的路线选择模型提供指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号