首页> 外文会议>Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference >THE DYNAMIC PERMEABILITY OF PROPPED AND NON-PROPPED ARTIFICIAL FRACTURE IN GRANITE AND BITUMINOUS COAL WITH CHANGES IN EFECTIVE STRESS
【24h】

THE DYNAMIC PERMEABILITY OF PROPPED AND NON-PROPPED ARTIFICIAL FRACTURE IN GRANITE AND BITUMINOUS COAL WITH CHANGES IN EFECTIVE STRESS

机译:花岗岩和有烟煤在有效应力中的变化和动态变化

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Low permeability coalbed reservoirs are often fractured to aid productivity. Typically a proppant-slurry is injected during thefracturing process to induced fractures and place proppants to retain the enhanced permeability. However, the dynamics of effectivestresses in the reservoir may result in proppant embedment. This occurs wither when the coal surfaceis softer than the proppant or inthe case of enhanced coalbed methane recoveryCO_2 induced coal softening or coal swelling may cause coal penetration into thepropped fracture. The resulting permeabilityis expected to be dynamic with effective stress and the pore gas pressure. We investigatepermeability transformations through a suite of laboratory experiments conducted on selected granite (non-sorbing hard rock), andbituminous coal cores sawn into two halves with a thin diamond coated blade. The permeability of the artificial “fracture/cleat” wasmeasured for a non-sorbing gas (He) and a sorbing gas (CO_2) at constant confining stress of 10MPa. Permeability was also determinedwith a uniform monolayer of #70-140 mesh proppant sand within the fracture. The presence of proppant increases the gas permeabilityin granite and coal by more than an order of magnitude, depending on the gas injected for the conditions evaluated. When a sorbinggas (CO_2) was injected, there was a reduction in permeability for the non-propped and propped coal experiments. However the gaspermeability of the propped fracture was always higher than that for the non-propped fracture. Surprisingly the relative reduction inpermeability, due to sorbing gas exposure, for the propped fracture was higher than that for the non-propped fracture. The heliumpermeability of non-propped and propped artificial fracture in granite decreases with effective stress. This decrease may be 2-3 timesif the effective stress increases from 4 MPa to 6 MPa. The permeability of propped fracture was 10-15 times higher than that of nonproppedfracture in granite. Similar observations are made for artificial fracture in bituminous coal. The increase in He permeabilitymay be as high as ~10 folds if monolayer proppant is sandwiched in the coal fracture. Similar increase is observed in the case ofsorptive gas (CO_2) permeability. These observations are consistent with a combination of coal swelling and/or an enhanced coalsoftening in the presence of this sorbing gas allowing proppant penetration into the coal or coal swelling encroaching into the fracture.
机译:低渗透性煤层气藏经常被压裂以提高生产率。通常在支撑过程中注入支撑剂浆液 压裂过程中诱发裂缝并放置支撑剂以保持增强的渗透性。但是,有效的动力 储层中的应力可能导致支撑剂嵌入。当煤层比支撑剂软或 煤层气采收率提高的情况CO_2引起的煤软化或煤溶胀可能导致煤渗透到煤层气中 支撑的骨折。预期所产生的渗透率在有效应力和孔隙气压的作用下是动态的。我们调查 通过在选定的花岗岩(非吸附性硬岩)上进行的一组实验室实验进行的渗透率转换,以及 用薄金刚石涂层刀片将沥青煤芯切成两半。人工“裂缝/劈裂”的渗透率为 在恒定围压为10MPa的条件下,对非吸附气体(He)和吸附气体(CO_2)进行测量。渗透率也被确定 裂缝内均匀分布有#70-140目支撑剂砂单层。支撑剂的存在增加了气体的渗透性 取决于所评估条件下注入的气体,花岗岩和煤中的碳氢化合物含量会增加一个数量级以上。当一个吸附 注入了二氧化碳(CO_2),非支撑煤和支撑煤实验的渗透率降低。但是气 支撑裂缝的渗透率总是高于非支撑裂缝的渗透率。令人惊讶的是 由于吸附气体的暴露,支撑裂缝的渗透率高于未支撑裂缝的渗透率。氦气 花岗岩中非支撑和支撑人工裂缝的渗透率随有效应力而降低。这种减少可能是2-3倍 如果有效应力从4 MPa增加到6 MPa。支撑裂缝的渗透率比非支撑裂缝高10-15倍 花岗岩断裂。对于烟煤的人为破裂也有类似的观察。氦气渗透率的增加 如果将单层支撑剂夹在煤层中,则可能高达〜10倍。在以下情况下,观察到类似的增加 吸附气体(CO_2)的渗透性。这些观察结果与煤溶胀和/或强化煤的组合相一致。 在存在这种吸附气体的情况下会软化,从而使支撑剂渗透到煤中或煤溶胀侵蚀到裂缝中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号