首页> 外文会议>International symposium on research in attacks, intrusion, and defenses >Paying for Piracy? An Analysis of One-Click Hosters' Controversial Reward Schemes
【24h】

Paying for Piracy? An Analysis of One-Click Hosters' Controversial Reward Schemes

机译:支付盗版费用?一键式托管者有争议的奖励方案分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

One-Click Hosters (OCHs) such as Rapidshare and now defunct Megaupload are popular services where users can upload and store large files. Uploaders can then share the files with friends or make them publicly available by publishing the download links in separate directories, so-called direct download or streaming sites. While OCHs have legitimate use cases, they are also frequently used to distribute pirated content. Many OCHs operate affiliate programmes to financially reward the uploaders of popular files. These affiliate programmes are controversial for allegedly financing piracy, and they were prominently cited in the criminal indictment that lead to the shutdown of Megaupload, once among the world's 100 largest web sites. In this paper, we provide insights into how much money uploaders of pirated content could earn on a range of direct download and streaming sites. While the potential earnings of a few uploaders are non-negligible, for most uploaders these amounts are so low that they cannot rationally explain profit-oriented behaviour.
机译:一键式托管服务商(OCH),例如Rapidshare和现已失效的Megaupload,是受欢迎的服务,用户可以在其中上传和存储大文件。然后,上传者可以与朋友共享文件,或者通过将下载链接发布到单独的目录(所谓的直接下载或流媒体站点)中来使其公开可用。虽然OCH具有合法的用例,但它们也经常用于分发盗版内容。许多OCH都运营会员计划,以从经济上奖励流行文件的上传者。这些联盟计划因涉嫌资助盗版而引起争议,并且在刑事起诉中被引人注目,该起诉导致Megaupload曾经关闭,而Megaupload曾经是全球100个最大的网站之一。在本文中,我们提供了有关盗版内容上传者在一系列直接下载和流媒体网站上可以赚取多少钱的见解。尽管少数上载者的潜在收入微不足道,但对于大多数上载者而言,这些金额太低,以至于他们无法合理地解释以利润为导向的行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号