首页> 外文会议>International conference on performance-based codes and fire safety design methods >ENFORCEMENT OF PERFORMANCE BASED BUILDING AND FIRE CODES IN A PRIVATISED BUILDING CONTROL SYSTEM
【24h】

ENFORCEMENT OF PERFORMANCE BASED BUILDING AND FIRE CODES IN A PRIVATISED BUILDING CONTROL SYSTEM

机译:专用建筑控制系统中基于性能的建筑和防火规范的执行

获取原文

摘要

Performance Based Building Codes have been operational in Australia for over 15 years following the introduction of the Building Code of Australia in 1996. Concurrently in many Australian States and Territories the administration and enforcement of Building Control is through private sector practitioners registered and authorized to administer various building and development legislation. Whilst the advent of private practicing Building Control officials is unique to only a number of countries in the world, very few outsource the "statutory authority" role to privately operating companies and/or individuals. Equally Performance Based Building Codes facilitate a process which encourages innovation through designing and / or assessment of alternative design solutions deviating from a deemed to satisfy community expected standards. The advent of design practitioners including Architects, Engineers, and Fire Engineers varying deemed to satisfy provisions derived from public policy, and approved by privately operating Building Control Officials, demands a robust approval system to ensure fire life safety and associated health and amenity objectives are achieved in all new and existing development. My paper outlines a number of scenarios in my capacity as a Fire Safety Engineering consultant and as private Building Code Official and considers the pros and cons of various frameworks including the importance of regulation, accreditation, registration, insurance and independence in the approval process, to best accommodate the reforms of privatisation and the cost benefits of performance based building codes.
机译:自从1996年引入《澳大利亚建筑规范》以来,基于性能的建筑规范在澳大利亚已经运行了15年以上。与此同时,在许多澳大利亚州和领地,建筑控制的行政和执法是通过注册并授权管理各种私人执业的从业人员进行的。建设和发展立法。尽管私人执业的建筑控制官员的到来仅在世界上许多国家中是唯一的,但很少有“法定权力”角色外包给私人公司和/或个人。同样基于性能的建筑规范通过鼓励设计和/或评估替代设计解决方案的方式鼓励创新,这些解决方案偏离了公认的满足社区期望标准的方式。包括建筑师,工程师和消防工程师在内的各种设计从业人员的到来,都被认为满足公共政策的要求,并得到了私人运营的建筑控制官员的批准,要求有一套强有力的批准制度,以确保实现消防生命安全以及相关的健康和便利性目标在所有新的和现有的发展中。我的论文概述了我作为消防安全工程顾问和私人建筑规范官员的各种情况,并考虑了各种框架的利弊,包括监管,认证,注册,保险和独立性在批准过程中的重要性,最适合私有化的改革以及基于性能的建筑规范的成本收益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号