首页> 外文会议>SPWLA annual logging symposium >DEEP? HOW DEEP AND WHAT? THE VAGARIES AND MYTHS OF “LOOK AROUND” DEEP-RESISTIVITY MEASUREMENTS WHILE DRILLING
【24h】

DEEP? HOW DEEP AND WHAT? THE VAGARIES AND MYTHS OF “LOOK AROUND” DEEP-RESISTIVITY MEASUREMENTS WHILE DRILLING

机译:深?深度如何?钻井过程中“环顾四周”深电阻率测量的虚构和神话

获取原文

摘要

Azimuthal resistivity measurements that can readdeeply (5 m ~17 ft) into a formation while drilling havebecome common. These measurements help to reduceuncertainty during well placement within the sweet-spotof a reservoir (often termed reservoir navigation orgeosteering). These measurements also help addressother important formation evaluation problems such assaturation, formation dip, anisotropy, etc. Azimuthaldeep-resistivity technologies all use multi-spacing,multi-component and multi-frequency inductionmeasurements. Some questions arise: what are thesemeasurements really measuring, and what do we reallyunderstand about their sensitivity? Even very basiccharacteristics of the deep-reading azimuthal resistivitytechnologies, such as depth of investigation (DOI) anddirectional sensitivity, are not very well understood.Providers also get accused of “black box” interpretationsolutions, which fail to communicate the understandingof the underlying tool responses. As we push to seeeven deeper while drilling - with these frequency-basedmeasurements - questions only intensify, as the geologybecomes more unpredictable and discontinuous, finallyto the extent that we have many unknowns anduncertainties.In this paper, we investigate some of the myths of deepreadingazimuthal resistivity technologies. We discusstheir characteristics based on a sensitivity analysisalgorithm that allows the calculation of uncertainties ofthe model parameters due to the noise present in thedata for any combination of measurements. Thisapproach allows us to analyze DOI and directionalsensitivity by comparing uncertainties in distance-tobedand formation resistivities for different toolconfigurations in various formation models. In thispaper, we consider some field examples of geosteeringapplications using deep-resistivity technologies. Weconclude with a discussion of an important element ofthis study: how much is “look around” versus howmuch is “look ahead”.
机译:可以读取的方位角电阻率测量值 在钻井过程中,深层(5 m〜17 ft)进入地层 变得普遍。这些测量有助于减少 最佳位置内井布置过程中的不确定性 水库的名称(通常称为水库导航或 地质导向)。这些测量也有助于解决 其他重要的编队评估问题,例如 饱和度,地层倾角,各向异性等。 深电阻率技术都使用多间距 多分量和多频感应 测量。出现了一些问题:这些是什么 量度真的在量度,我们真正地是什么 了解他们的敏感性?甚至很基础 深度方位电阻率的特征 技术,例如调查深度(DOI)和 方向灵敏度,还不是很了解。 提供者还被指控“黑匣子”的解释 解决方案,无法传达理解 基础工具响应。当我们推动看到 钻进时甚至更深-这些基于频率的 测量-随着地质的发展,问题只会愈演愈烈 变得更加不可预测和不连续,最后 在一定程度上,我们有许多未知数, 不确定性。 在本文中,我们研究了深度阅读的一些神话 方位电阻率技术。我们讨论 基于敏感性分析的特征 允许计算不确定度的算法 由于存在于噪声中的模型参数 任何测量组合的数据。这 方法使我们能够分析DOI和定向 通过比较到床的距离的不确定性来提高灵敏度 和不同工具的地层电阻率 各种编队模型中的配置。在这个 在本文中,我们考虑了一些地质导向的实例 使用深电阻率技术的应用程序。我们 最后讨论了一个重要因素 这项研究:“环顾四周”与 很多事情是“展望未来”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号