首页> 外文会议>American Helicopter Society International Annual Forum >CFD Analysis of High-Lift Devices on the SC-1094R8 Airfoil
【24h】

CFD Analysis of High-Lift Devices on the SC-1094R8 Airfoil

机译:SC-1094R8机翼上的高起重装置的CFD分析

获取原文

摘要

This paper compares the effect of three trailing-edge high-lift devices on the SC-1094R8 airfoil. The devices considered were a trailing-edge Gurney Flap (GF) at 0.5,1, 1.5, and 2% chord, a 20% chord Trailing-Edge Flap (TEF) deflected to 2°, 4°, and 6°, and an extendable Trailing-Edge Plate (TEP) extended to 10% or 20% of the baseline chord at deployment angles of 2° and 4° to the chord line. The quasi-steady, 2D lift, drag, and pitching moment coefficients were calculated using the TURNS Navier-Stokes CFD code. For the device deflection amplitudes considered, increase in maximum lift coefficient with a TEF was significantly lower than that achieved with the TEP and the GF. However, the GF has a much larger drag penalty at lower lift coefficient values. For the maximum increases in lift coefficient with the different devices over the deflection range considered, the nose-down pitching moment penalty is the highest for the GF at lower angles of attack but the TEP moment penalty becomes comparable at higher angles of attack approaching stall. The TEF moment penalty is the lowest of the three. Since TEFs and GFs can be deployed at high frequency and are of potential interest for vibrationoise reduction and performance improvement, the study also focused on comparing their efficiency in terms of increment in lift or moment per unit increment in drag at low to moderate angles of attack (prior to stall). Due to the large drag penalty suffered by GFs, the TEF appears to be more efficient from an aerodynamic standpoint for vibrationoise/performance improvement applications.
机译:本文比较了三个后缘高升力装置对SC-1094R8机翼的影响。所考虑的设备是:弦的后缘盖尼襟翼(GF)为0.5、1、1.5和2%,弦的后缘襟翼(TEF)为20%,其偏转为2°,4°和6°,并且可扩展的后缘板(TEP)以相对于弦线2°和4°的展开角度扩展到基准弦的10%或20%。使用TURNS Navier-Stokes CFD代码计算准稳态,二维升力,阻力和俯仰力矩系数。对于所考虑的器件偏转幅度,TEF的最大升力系数的增加显着低于TEP和GF的增加。但是,GF在较低的升力系数值下具有更大的阻力损失。对于不同设备在所考虑的偏转范围内升力系数的最大增加,对于较低的迎角,GF的机头向下俯仰力矩损失最高,但在接近失速的较高迎角下,TEP力矩损失变得可比。 TEF力矩惩罚是三个中最低的。由于TEF和GF可以高频率部署,并且对于降低振动/噪声和改善性能具有潜在的意义,因此该研究还集中在以低角度或中角度的升力增量或每单位阻力增量增加力矩的方式比较它们的效率。攻击(在失速之前)。由于GF受到的大阻力损失,从空气动力学的角度来看,TEF似乎在振动/噪声/性能改进应用中效率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号