首页> 外文会议>International topical meeting on probabilistic safety assessment and analysis;PSA 2011 >ADVANCING PERFORMANCE-BASED AND RISK-INFORMED DESIGN METHODS FOR THE SEISMIC DESIGN AND REGULATION OF SSCs IN NPPs
【24h】

ADVANCING PERFORMANCE-BASED AND RISK-INFORMED DESIGN METHODS FOR THE SEISMIC DESIGN AND REGULATION OF SSCs IN NPPs

机译:核电厂SSC抗震设计和调节的基于性能和风险信息的先进设计方法

获取原文

摘要

The current NRC regulations for design and analysis of nuclear power plants to resist large earthquakes use a framework that is partially risk-informed, in the sense that a target performance goal of 10"5 per year is the design target for the design of every individual SSC (structure, system, or component) that contributes significantly to the safety performance of the plant. However, the current framework does not admit design-specific or plant-specific PSA information directly as a part of the technical basis used to determine whether an SSC should be approved. Instead, the design rules and analysis provisions have used information from the body of seismic PSAs already in the literature to inform how the design process and analysis provisions themselves are framed. This is "risk informed" but not fully so, and it is also not fully performance-based because although the target is framed in probabilistic terms, most of the design rules are prescriptive, rather than allowing the designer to choose his/her own design approach. This paper will discuss a group of several proposals, any one of which could advance the situation significantly toward a more fully performance-based and risk-informed framework. This paper will discuss the technical basis for each of the several proposals, what valid reasons stand in the way of their early implementation, and what research could be undertaken to help move the seismic design and approval process along toward a more nearly risk-informed and performance-based framework.
机译:当前的NRC核电厂设计和分析抵抗大地震的法规使用了部分风险告知的框架,即每年10“ 5的目标性能目标是每个人的设计目标对工厂的安全性能有重大贡献的SSC(结构,系统或组件),但是,当前框架不允许直接将特定于设计或特定于工厂的PSA信息作为确定是否采用安全保护措施的技术基础的一部分。应该批准SSC,相反,设计规则和分析规定使用了文献中已有的地震PSA主体提供的信息来告知设计过程和分析规定本身是如何构成的,这是“有风险的”,但并非完全如此,而且它也不是完全基于性能的,因为尽管目标是用概率来表述的,但是大多数设计规则都是规定性的,而不是允许设计者使用。选择自己的设计方法。本文将讨论由几个提议组成的一组提议,其中任何一个提议都可以将情况显着地朝着更加完全基于绩效和风险告知的框架发展。本文将讨论这几项提案中每项提案的技术基础,阻碍其早期实施的有效理由,以及可以进行哪些研究来帮助将地震设计和批准过程朝着更加接近风险的方向发展。基于性能的框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号